• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖腹手术与非剖腹手术治疗早期预后良好型霍奇金病的决策分析

Laparotomy versus no laparotomy in the management of early-stage, favorable-prognosis Hodgkin's disease: a decision analysis.

作者信息

Ng A K, Weeks J C, Mauch P M, Kuntz K M

机构信息

Joint Center for Radiation Therapy and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jan;17(1):241-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.241.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.241
PMID:10458239
Abstract

PURPOSE

To perform a decision analysis that compared the life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy of early-stage, favorable-prognosis Hodgkin's disease (HD) managed with and without staging laparotomy, incorporating data on treatment outcomes of HD in the modern era.

METHODS

We constructed a decision-analytic model to compare laparotomy versus no laparotomy staging for a hypothetical cohort of 25-year-old patients with clinical stages I and II, favorable-prognosis HD. Markov models were used to simulate the lifetime clinical course of patients, whose prognosis depended on the true pathologic stage and initial treatment. The baseline probability estimates used in the model were derived from results of published studies. Quality-of-life adjustments for procedures and treatments, as well as the various long-term health states, were incorporated.

RESULTS

The life expectancy was 36.67 years for the laparotomy strategy and 35.92 years for no laparotomy, yielding a net expected benefit of 0.75 years for laparotomy staging. The corresponding quality-adjusted life expectancies for the two strategies were 35.97 and 35.38 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively, resulting in a net expected benefit of laparotomy staging of 0.59 QALYs. Sensitivity analysis showed that the decision of laparotomy versus no laparotomy was most heavily influenced by the quality-of-life weight assigned to the postlaparotomy state.

CONCLUSION

Our model predicted that on average, for a 25-year-old patient, proceeding with staging laparotomy resulted in a gain in life expectancy of 9 months, or 7 quality-adjusted months. These results suggest that a role remains for surgical staging in the management of early-stage HD.

摘要

目的

进行一项决策分析,比较采用和不采用分期剖腹术治疗的早期、预后良好的霍奇金淋巴瘤(HD)患者的预期寿命和质量调整预期寿命,并纳入现代HD治疗结果的数据。

方法

我们构建了一个决策分析模型,以比较剖腹术分期与非剖腹术分期对一组假设的25岁临床I期和II期、预后良好的HD患者的影响。采用马尔可夫模型模拟患者的终生临床病程,其预后取决于真正的病理分期和初始治疗。模型中使用的基线概率估计值来自已发表研究的结果。纳入了手术和治疗以及各种长期健康状态的生活质量调整。

结果

剖腹术策略的预期寿命为36.67年,非剖腹术为35.92年,剖腹术分期的净预期益处为0.75年。两种策略相应的质量调整预期寿命分别为35.97和35.38质量调整生命年(QALY),剖腹术分期的净预期益处为0.59 QALY。敏感性分析表明,剖腹术与非剖腹术的决策受剖腹术后状态生活质量权重的影响最大。

结论

我们的模型预测,平均而言,对于一名25岁的患者,进行分期剖腹术可使预期寿命增加9个月,或质量调整增加7个月。这些结果表明,手术分期在早期HD的治疗中仍有作用。

相似文献

1
Laparotomy versus no laparotomy in the management of early-stage, favorable-prognosis Hodgkin's disease: a decision analysis.剖腹手术与非剖腹手术治疗早期预后良好型霍奇金病的决策分析
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jan;17(1):241-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.241.
2
Decision analysis on alternative treatment strategies for favorable-prognosis, early-stage Hodgkin's disease.早期预后良好型霍奇金淋巴瘤替代治疗策略的决策分析
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Nov;17(11):3577-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3577.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of computerized tomography in the routine follow-up of patients after primary treatment for Hodgkin's disease.霍奇金病初次治疗后患者常规随访中计算机断层扫描的成本效益分析
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 1;24(25):4116-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.0409.
4
Costs and effectiveness of staging and treatment options in early-stage Hodgkin's disease.早期霍奇金淋巴瘤分期及治疗方案的成本与效果
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Jul 15;50(4):979-89. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01546-2.
5
Impact of preoperative staging and chemoradiation versus postoperative chemoradiation on outcome in patients with rectal cancer: a decision analysis.术前分期及放化疗与术后放化疗对直肠癌患者预后的影响:一项决策分析
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Feb 4;96(3):191-201. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh026.
6
Combined modality therapy versus chemotherapy alone as an induction regimen for primary central nervous system lymphoma: a decision analysis.联合治疗与单纯化疗作为原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤诱导治疗方案的比较:决策分析。
Br J Haematol. 2012 Sep;158(5):600-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09208.x. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
7
Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus surgery for medically operable Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a Markov model-based decision analysis.立体定向体部放疗与手术治疗可手术的 I 期非小细胞肺癌:基于马尔可夫模型的决策分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):964-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.040. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
8
Clinical staging versus laparotomy and combined modality with MOPP versus ABVD in early-stage Hodgkin's disease: the H6 twin randomized trials from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Cooperative Group.早期霍奇金淋巴瘤的临床分期与剖腹探查术对比,以及MOPP方案与ABVD方案联合治疗对比:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织淋巴瘤协作组的H6双生子随机试验
J Clin Oncol. 1993 Nov;11(11):2258-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.11.2258.
9
[Laparotomy in Hodgkin's disease: significance of splenic involvement].[霍奇金病剖腹探查术:脾脏受累的意义]
Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Jul 15;131(2):115-8.
10
Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者的肺癌计算机断层扫描筛查:决策分析与成本效益分析
Ann Oncol. 2006 May;17(5):785-93. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl023. Epub 2006 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Brentuximab Vedotin With Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Stage III and IV Hodgkin Lymphoma.本妥昔单抗联合化疗用于新诊断的III期和IV期霍奇金淋巴瘤的成本效益分析
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 4;36(33):JCO1800122. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00122.