Silva A C, Lee S P, Yang G, Iadecola C, Kim S G
Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999 Aug;19(8):871-9. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199908000-00006.
The blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast mechanism can be modeled as a complex interplay between CBF, cerebral blood volume (CBV), and CMRO2. Positive BOLD signal changes are presumably caused by CBF changes in excess of increases in CMRO2. Because this uncoupling between CBF and CMRO2 may not always be present, the magnitude of BOLD changes may not be a good index of CBF changes. In this study, the relation between BOLD and CBF was investigated further. Continuous arterial spin labeling was combined with a single-shot, multislice echo-planar imaging to enable simultaneous measurements of BOLD and CBF changes in a well-established model of functional brain activation, the electrical forepaw stimulation of alpha-chloralose-anesthetized rats. The paradigm consisted of two 18- to 30-second stimulation periods separated by a 1-minute resting interval. Stimulation parameters were optimized by laser Doppler flowmetry. For the same cross-correlation threshold, the BOLD and CBF active maps were centered within the size of one pixel (470 microm). However, the BOLD map was significantly larger than the CBF map. Measurements taken from 15 rats at 9.4 T using a 10-millisecond echo-time showed 3.7 +/- 1.7% BOLD and 125.67 +/- 81.7% CBF increases in the contralateral somatosensory cortex during the first stimulation, and 2.6 +/- 1.2% BOLD and 79.3 +/- 43.6% CBF increases during the second stimulation. The correlation coefficient between BOLD and CBF changes was 0.89. The overall temporal correlation coefficient between BOLD and CBF time-courses was 0.97. These results show that under the experimental conditions of the current study, the BOLD signal changes follow the changes in CBF.
血氧水平依赖(BOLD)对比机制可被模拟为脑血流量(CBF)、脑血容量(CBV)和脑氧代谢率(CMRO2)之间的复杂相互作用。正向BOLD信号变化大概是由CBF变化超过CMRO2增加所致。由于CBF和CMRO2之间的这种解耦可能并非总是存在,BOLD变化的幅度可能不是CBF变化的良好指标。在本研究中,进一步探究了BOLD与CBF之间的关系。连续动脉自旋标记与单次激发、多层回波平面成像相结合,以便在功能脑激活的成熟模型(即α-氯醛糖麻醉大鼠的电刺激前爪)中同时测量BOLD和CBF变化。该范式包括两个18至30秒的刺激期,中间间隔1分钟的静息期。通过激光多普勒血流仪优化刺激参数。对于相同的互相关阈值,BOLD和CBF激活图在一个像素(470微米)大小范围内居中。然而,BOLD图明显大于CBF图。在9.4 T场强下对15只大鼠进行测量,使用10毫秒回波时间,结果显示在第一次刺激期间,对侧体感皮层的BOLD增加3.7±1.7%,CBF增加125.67±81.7%;在第二次刺激期间,BOLD增加2.6±1.2%,CBF增加79.3±43.6%。BOLD与CBF变化之间的相关系数为0.89。BOLD与CBF时间进程之间的总体时间相关系数为0.97。这些结果表明,在本研究的实验条件下,BOLD信号变化跟随CBF的变化。