Kim Tae, Hendrich Kristy S, Masamoto Kazuto, Kim Seong-Gi
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203, USA.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007 Jun;27(6):1235-47. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600429. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
Quantifying both arterial cerebral blood volume (CBV(a)) changes and total cerebral blood volume (CBV(t)) changes during neural activation can provide critical information about vascular control mechanisms, and help to identify the origins of neurovascular responses in conventional blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cerebral blood flow (CBF), CBV(a), and CBV(t) were quantified by MRI at 9.4 T in isoflurane-anesthetized rats during 15-s duration forepaw stimulation. Cerebral blood flow and CBV(a) were simultaneously determined by modulation of tissue and vessel signals using arterial spin labeling, while CBV(t) was measured with a susceptibility-based contrast agent. Baseline versus stimulation values in a region centered over the somatosensory cortex were: CBF=150+/-18 versus 182+/-20 mL/100 g/min, CBV(a)=0.83+/-0.21 versus 1.17+/-0.30 mL/100 g, CBV(t)=3.10+/-0.55 versus 3.41+/-0.61 mL/100 g, and CBV(a)/CBV(t)=0.27+/-0.05 versus 0.34+/-0.06 (n=7, mean+/-s.d.). Neural activity-induced absolute changes in CBV(a) and CBV(t) are statistically equivalent and independent of the spatial extent of regional analysis. Under our conditions, increased CBV(t) during neural activation originates mainly from arterial rather than venous blood volume changes, and therefore a critical implication is that venous blood volume changes may be negligible in BOLD fMRI.
在神经激活过程中对动脉脑血容量(CBV(a))变化和总脑血容量(CBV(t))变化进行量化,可以提供有关血管控制机制的关键信息,并有助于在传统的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)磁共振成像(MRI)中识别神经血管反应的起源。在异氟烷麻醉的大鼠中,于9.4 T磁场下,通过MRI在15秒的前爪刺激期间对脑血流量(CBF)、CBV(a)和CBV(t)进行量化。使用动脉自旋标记通过调制组织和血管信号同时测定脑血流量和CBV(a),而使用基于磁化率的造影剂测量CBV(t)。以体感皮层为中心的区域中的基线值与刺激值分别为:CBF = 150±18对182±20 mL/100 g/min,CBV(a) = 0.83±0.21对1.17±0.30 mL/每100 g,CBV(t) = 3.10±0.55对3.41±0.61 mL/每100 g,以及CBV(a)/CBV(t) = 0.27±0.05对0.34±0.06(n = 7,平均值±标准差)。神经活动诱导的CBV(a)和CBV(t)的绝对变化在统计学上是等效的,并且与区域分析的空间范围无关。在我们的条件下,神经激活期间CBV(t)的增加主要源于动脉血容量变化而非静脉血容量变化,因此一个关键的含义是静脉血容量变化在BOLD功能磁共振成像中可能可以忽略不计。