Klingemann H
Swiss Institute for the Prevention of Alcohol and Drug Problems, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eur Addict Res. 1999 Sep;5(3):109-17. doi: 10.1159/000018978.
Drug policy development is mostly viewed as emerging within the nation state. Processes of diffusion of innovative policies have been neglected to a large extent. The comparative study of public policy has demonstrated, however, that diffusion is an important predictor of early policy adaptation. Thus, the analysis asks the general question of the relative importance of endogenous and exogenous effects on the development of drug policies in various countries. Specifically it describes the Swiss debate leading to the popular initiative on 'Youth Without Drugs' as well as the international reactions regarding its liberal outcome. Results of an expert survey show two broad types of reactions. There is one set of countries where chances for the introduction of limited heroin-prescription trials during the next 5 years are considered probable and a second set of countries which seems to be strictly status quo oriented. In the concluding section a model is suggested which systematically considers endogenous as well as exogenous predictors of 'soft' or 'hard' drug policy adoption. Results of a first tentative test of the model are encouraging for future empirical research on diffusion processes of drug policies.
药物政策的制定大多被视为在民族国家内部出现的情况。创新政策的传播过程在很大程度上被忽视了。然而,公共政策的比较研究表明,传播是早期政策采纳的一个重要预测因素。因此,该分析提出了一个一般性问题,即内生和外生因素对各国药物政策发展的相对重要性。具体而言,它描述了瑞士引发“无毒品青年”全民公投的辩论,以及国际社会对其宽松结果的反应。一项专家调查的结果显示了两种广泛的反应。有一组国家认为在未来5年内引入有限的海洛因处方试验是有可能的,而另一组国家似乎严格倾向于维持现状。在结论部分,提出了一个模型,该模型系统地考虑了“软性”或“硬性”药物政策采纳的内生和外生预测因素。该模型首次初步测试的结果对未来药物政策传播过程的实证研究具有鼓舞作用。