• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种简短的肺部特异性健康状况测量方法在慢性阻塞性肺疾病门诊患者中的应用效果

Performance of a short lung-specific health status measure in outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

作者信息

Stavem K, Erikssen J, Boe J

机构信息

HELTEF Foundation for Health Services Research, Central Hospital of Akershus, Nordbyhagen, Norway.

出版信息

Respir Med. 1999 Jul;93(7):467-75. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(99)90089-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0954-6111(99)90089-6
PMID:10464833
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the performance of a lung-specific health status measure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We used the Respiratory Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), a modification of an Australian questionnaire intended for asthma patients and adapted in this study to fit patients with COPD also. For comparison we chose the general health profile measure Short Form 36 (SF-36). We assessed the five RQLQ scales and eight SF-36 scales for reliability, validity and responsiveness in 59 outpatients attending a Norwegian hospital for COPD. Statistical analysis included internal consistency, test-retest reliability and convergent validity between the two questionnaires. Responsiveness was assessed in patients reporting global change in health status over 1 year. All scales of the RQLQ showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's a = 0.85-0.94) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.86-0.94), as did the SF-36 scales (a = 0.66-0.90) and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.60-0.86). Pearson correlations between scales with similar items ranged from 0.54 to 0.76, supporting the construct validity of both questionnaires. The RQLQ had responsive scales, showing significant changes in the expected direction over 1 year. We conclude that the RQLQ showed an acceptable reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in COPD patients, encouraging further use of this questionnaire.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估一种针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的肺部特异性健康状况测量工具的性能。我们使用了呼吸生活质量问卷(RQLQ),它是对一份澳大利亚哮喘患者问卷的修改版,在本研究中也进行了调整以适用于COPD患者。为了进行比较,我们选择了一般健康状况测量工具简明健康状况调查量表(SF - 36)。我们评估了59名在挪威一家医院就诊的COPD门诊患者的RQLQ五个量表和SF - 36八个量表的信度、效度和反应度。统计分析包括两个问卷之间的内部一致性、重测信度和收敛效度。对报告1年健康状况有总体变化的患者评估反应度。RQLQ的所有量表都显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.85 - 0.94)和重测信度(组内相关系数 = 0.86 - 0.94),SF - 36量表也是如此(α = 0.66 - 0.90)和组内相关系数 = 0.60 - 0.86)。具有相似项目的量表之间的Pearson相关性在0.54至0.76之间,支持了两个问卷的结构效度。RQLQ有反应性量表,显示在1年中朝着预期方向有显著变化。我们得出结论,RQLQ在COPD患者中显示出可接受的信度、结构效度和反应度,鼓励进一步使用该问卷。

相似文献

1
Performance of a short lung-specific health status measure in outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.一种简短的肺部特异性健康状况测量方法在慢性阻塞性肺疾病门诊患者中的应用效果
Respir Med. 1999 Jul;93(7):467-75. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(99)90089-6.
2
A new self-administered questionnaire to monitor health-related quality of life in patients with COPD. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP) Investigators.一种用于监测慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者健康相关生活质量的新型自填式问卷。门诊护理质量改进项目(ACQUIP)研究人员。
Chest. 1997 Sep;112(3):614-22. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.3.614.
3
Health status, dyspnea, lung function and exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的健康状况、呼吸困难、肺功能及运动能力
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999 Oct;3(10):920-6.
4
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity Study of the Persian Version of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire.慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床问卷波斯语版的跨文化适应、信度和效度研究
Acta Med Iran. 2016 Aug;54(8):518-524.
5
A disease-specific measure of health-related quality of life in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura: psychometric testing in an open-label clinical trial.慢性免疫性血小板减少性紫癜成年患者健康相关生活质量的疾病特异性测量:一项开放标签临床试验中的心理测量测试
Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):950-962. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.005.
6
Dialectal influence on chronic pulmonary disease assessment test: the reliability and validity study.方言对慢性肺病评估测试的影响:可靠性与有效性研究
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Mar 11;10:541-8. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S79041. eCollection 2015.
7
Reliability and validity of the COOP/WONCA health status measure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中COOP/WONCA健康状况测量指标的可靠性和有效性。
Qual Life Res. 2002 Sep;11(6):527-33. doi: 10.1023/a:1016345428638.
8
Preliminary validation and reliability of the Short Form Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire in a lung cancer population.肺癌人群中慢性呼吸道疾病问卷简表的初步验证及信度分析
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Jan;26(1). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12418. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
9
Comparison of outcome measures for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in an outpatient setting.门诊环境中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者结局指标的比较。
Thorax. 1997 Oct;52(10):879-87. doi: 10.1136/thx.52.10.879.
10
Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the ECOS-16 questionnaire in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.ECOS-16问卷意大利语版本在患有骨质疏松症所致椎体骨折的绝经后女性中的效度和信度
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 May-Jun;25(3):390-403.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden, resilience and coping in caregivers of patients with interstitial lung disease.间质性肺疾病患者照料者的负担、复原力及应对方式
Heart Lung. 2018 May-Jun;47(3):264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
2
Interpretation of change and longitudinal validity of the quality of life for respiratory illness questionnaire (QoLRIQ) in inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.
Qual Life Res. 2003 Mar;12(2):133-45. doi: 10.1023/a:1022213223673.
3
Reliability and validity of the COOP/WONCA health status measure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中COOP/WONCA健康状况测量指标的可靠性和有效性。
Qual Life Res. 2002 Sep;11(6):527-33. doi: 10.1023/a:1016345428638.