• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: implications for the representation of unattended sound.

作者信息

Tremblay S, Jones D M

机构信息

School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Wales.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Aug;25(4):1005-15. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1005.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1005
PMID:10464942
Abstract

Sequences of changing sounds that are irrelevant to the task at hand disrupt serial recall appreciably even though participants are instructed to ignore the sounds. Three experiments, which compared the effect of changing token identity with that of changing intensity in the 55- to 85-dB (A) range, were conducted. Although serial recall was impaired by changes in token identity, no disruptive effects of a change in intensity were found. This was replicated using speech and nonspeech. Overall, the absence of a changing intensity effect was based on an analysis of the performance of 115 participants in a design whose power was .98. This outcome suggests that the representation of intensity in preattentive processing of auditory stimuli is somewhat different from that of other acoustic features.

摘要

相似文献

1
Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: implications for the representation of unattended sound.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Aug;25(4):1005-15. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1005.
2
Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.无关言语会损害儿童和成人言语序列回忆,但不会损害空间项目。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):307-320. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01359-2. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
The irrelevant sound effect: does speech play a special role?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Nov;26(6):1750-4. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1750.
4
Elimination of the word length effect by irrelevant sound revisited.
Mem Cognit. 2000 Jul;28(5):841-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03198419.
5
What characterizes changing-state speech in affecting short-term memory? An EEG study on the irrelevant sound effect.改变状态的言语是如何影响短期记忆的?关于无关声音效应的一项 EEG 研究。
Psychophysiology. 2011 Dec;48(12):1669-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01263.x. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
6
Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.无关声音效应与后缀效应之间的相似性。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):841-848. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0806-8.
7
The role of speech fidelity in the irrelevant sound effect: Insights from noise-vocoded speech backgrounds.言语保真度在无关声音效应中的作用:来自噪声编码语音背景的见解。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2152-2161. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739257. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
8
The role of speech-specific properties of the background in the irrelevant sound effect.背景的特定语音属性在无关声音效应中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(3):581-9. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.821708. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
9
The neural basis of sublexical speech and corresponding nonspeech processing: a combined EEG-MEG study.次词汇言语及相应非言语加工的神经基础:一项脑电图-脑磁图联合研究
Brain Lang. 2014 Mar;130:19-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
10
Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.任务特异性听觉分心对系列回忆和心算的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2023 May;51(4):930-951. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01363-6. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Loud Auditory Distractors Are More Difficult to Ignore After All.大声的听觉干扰物更难被忽视。
Exp Psychol. 2022 May;69(3):163-171. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000554.
2
Effects of Noise Type and Noise Sensitivity on Working Memory and Noise Annoyance.噪声类型和噪声敏感性对工作记忆和噪声烦恼的影响。
Noise Health. 2022 Jul-Sep;24(114):173-181. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_6_22.
3
Monetary incentives have only limited effects on auditory distraction: evidence for the automaticity of cross-modal attention capture.货币激励对听觉分心的影响有限:跨模态注意捕获自动性的证据。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):2997-3009. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01455-5. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
4
Irrelevant music: How suprasegmental changes of a melody's tempo and mode affect the disruptive potential of music on serial recall.不相关音乐:旋律的音高和调式的超音段变化如何影响音乐对系列回忆的干扰潜力。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Aug;48(6):982-993. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01037-1.
5
Effects of combined traffic noise on the synaptic ultrastructure and expressions of p-CaMKII and NMDAR1 in the hippocampus of young SD rats.交通噪声复合暴露对幼年 SD 大鼠海马突触超微结构及 p-CaMKII、NMDAR1 表达的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(21):22030-22039. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05457-8. Epub 2019 May 29.
6
The impact of road traffic noise on cognitive performance in attention-based tasks depends on noise level even within moderate-level ranges.即使在中等水平范围内,道路交通噪音对基于注意力任务的认知表现的影响也取决于噪音水平。
Noise Health. 2015 May-Jun;17(76):148-57. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.155845.
7
Disruption by speech of serial short-term memory: the role of changing-state vowels.言语对系列短时记忆的干扰:可变状态元音的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):886-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03196781.
8
The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.无关言语效应与儿童:发展变化的理论启示
Mem Cognit. 2002 Apr;30(3):478-87. doi: 10.3758/bf03194948.
9
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000).过程或内容对记忆的干扰?对尼斯(2000年)的回应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):550-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03214370.
10
Elimination of the word length effect by irrelevant sound revisited.
Mem Cognit. 2000 Jul;28(5):841-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03198419.