• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

言语对系列短时记忆的干扰:可变状态元音的作用。

Disruption by speech of serial short-term memory: the role of changing-state vowels.

作者信息

Hughes Robert W, Tremblay Sébastien, Jones Dylan M

机构信息

School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):886-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03196781.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196781
PMID:16524006
Abstract

Serial short-term memory is markedly impaired by the presence of irrelevant speech so long as the successive tokens within the irrelevant speech are phonologically (or acoustically) dissimilar (Jones & Macken, 1995b). In two experiments in which consonant-vowel-consonant syllables were used as irrelevant speech tokens, we sought to evaluate the relative disruptive potency of changes in the final consonant only (Experiment 1), in the initial consonant, or in the vowel portion (Experiment 2) of each token. The results suggest that the vowel changes are the dominant source of disruption. This dominance may be explained, at least in part, by the role played by vowel sounds in the perceptual organization of speech and, in turn, the particular propensity for vowel changes to yield information about serial order. The results are consistent also with the view that the factors that promote order encoding in sound are also the ones that promote disruption.

摘要

只要无关言语中的连续片段在语音(或声学)上不相似,系列短时记忆就会受到显著损害(琼斯和麦肯,1995b)。在两项以辅音-元音-辅音音节作为无关言语片段的实验中,我们试图评估仅改变每个片段的最后一个辅音(实验1)、第一个辅音或元音部分(实验2)时相对的干扰效力。结果表明,元音变化是干扰的主要来源。这种主导地位至少可以部分地通过元音在言语感知组织中所起的作用来解释,进而通过元音变化产生关于序列顺序信息的特殊倾向来解释。这些结果也与以下观点一致,即促进声音中顺序编码的因素也是促进干扰的因素。

相似文献

1
Disruption by speech of serial short-term memory: the role of changing-state vowels.言语对系列短时记忆的干扰:可变状态元音的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):886-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03196781.
2
Short-term memory errors for spoken syllables are affected by the linguistic structure of the syllables.口语音节的短期记忆错误受音节语言结构的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Jan;14(1):145-52. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.1.145.
3
Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.无关言语会损害儿童和成人言语序列回忆,但不会损害空间项目。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):307-320. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01359-2. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
4
The relation between discriminability and memory for vowels, consonants, and silent-center vowels.元音、辅音和无声中心元音的可辨别性与记忆之间的关系。
Mem Cognit. 1996 May;24(3):356-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03213299.
5
Context-independent dynamic information for the perception of coarticulated vowels.用于协同发音元音感知的上下文无关动态信息。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Jul;106(1):438-48. doi: 10.1121/1.427067.
6
Dynamic information in the identification and discrimination of vowels.元音识别与区分中的动态信息。
Phonetica. 1989;46(1-3):97-116. doi: 10.1159/000261831.
7
Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.协同元音诱发听觉事件相关电位的频谱时域特征贡献。
Ear Hear. 2009 Dec;30(6):704-12. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b1d42d.
8
Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?无关言语、发音抑制和手动敲击对言语短时记忆的干扰:它们有共同的来源吗?
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Nov;56(8):1249-68. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000765.
9
Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.无关声音干扰言语产生:探究短期记忆与实验诱发的口误之间的关系。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 Oct;57(7):1309-40. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000783.
10
Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.无关言语对短期记忆的特权访问:状态变化的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 May;44(4):645-69. doi: 10.1080/14640749208401304.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence of a metacognitive illusion in stimulus-specific prospective judgments of distraction by background speech.背景言语干扰下刺激特异性前瞻性判断的元认知错觉的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 15;14(1):24111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74719-4.
2
Attention capture by own name decreases with speech compression.自身名字的注意力捕获随着语音压缩而减少。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 May 12;9(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00555-9.
3
Effects of temporally regular versus irregular distractors on goal-directed cognition and behavior.时相规则与不规则分心物对目标导向认知和行为的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech.背景言语重复且连续时会出现无关言语效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Sep;2(3):391-7. doi: 10.3758/BF03210978.
2
The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.与任务无关的听觉序列和与任务相关的视觉序列之间的顺序不一致的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Apr;31(2):316-27. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.316.
3
Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000).过程或内容对记忆的干扰?对尼斯(2000年)的回应。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 15;12(1):10020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13211-3.
4
Doubts About the Role of Rehearsal in the Irrelevant Sound Effect.对排练在无关声音效应中作用的质疑。
Exp Psychol. 2021 Sep;68(5):229-242. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000527. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
5
Effect of Auditory Distraction on Working Memory, Attention Switching, and Listening Comprehension.听觉干扰对工作记忆、注意力转换和听力理解的影响。
Audiol Res. 2021 May 28;11(2):227-243. doi: 10.3390/audiolres11020021.
6
Can 'Hebb' Be Distracted? Testing the Susceptibility of Sequence Learning to Auditory Distraction.“赫布理论”会被干扰吗?测试序列学习对听觉干扰的敏感性。
J Cogn. 2018 Jan 10;2(1):4. doi: 10.5334/joc.8.
7
Metacognition in Auditory Distraction: How Expectations about Distractibility Influence the Irrelevant Sound Effect.听觉分心任务中的元认知:关于分心可能性的预期如何影响无关声音效应。
J Cogn. 2017 Nov 30;1(1):2. doi: 10.5334/joc.3.
8
The role of speech-specific properties of the background in the irrelevant sound effect.背景的特定语音属性在无关声音效应中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(3):581-9. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.821708. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):550-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03214370.
4
The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).语音回路与无关言语效应:对尼斯(2000年)的一些评论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):544-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03214369.
5
Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.模拟无关言语对记忆的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Sep;7(3):403-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03214356.
6
Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: implications for models of short-term verbal memory.语音相似性与无关言语效应:对短期言语记忆模型的启示
Memory. 2000 May;8(3):145-57. doi: 10.1080/096582100387579.
7
Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: implications for the representation of unattended sound.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Aug;25(4):1005-15. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1005.
8
On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.论语音相似性与无关言语效应的无关性。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1997 Feb;50(1):100-18. doi: 10.1080/713755679.
9
Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness: a new approach to the irrelevant speech effect.无关言语、系列复述与时间独特性:一种研究无关言语效应的新方法。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Sep;22(5):1154-65. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.5.1154.
10
The relation between discriminability and memory for vowels, consonants, and silent-center vowels.元音、辅音和无声中心元音的可辨别性与记忆之间的关系。
Mem Cognit. 1996 May;24(3):356-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03213299.