Nagamachi C Y, Pieczarka J C, Muniz J A, Barros R M, Mattevi M S
Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Am J Primatol. 1999 Oct;49(2):133-52. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(199910)49:2<133::AID-AJP5>3.0.CO;2-6.
Cytogenetic and cytotaxonomic studies (G, C, sequential G/C, and NOR banding) were performed on 110 specimens representing the four genera of South American primates of the family Callitrichidae: Cebuella (C. pygmaea), Callithrix, groups argentata (C. argentata, C. emiliae, C. chrysoleuca, C. humeralifera, C. mauesi), and jacchus (C. aurita, C. geoffroyi, C. jacchus, C. kuhli, C. penicillata), Leontopithecus (L. chrysomelas, L. rosalia), and Saguinus (S. midas midas, S. m. niger). Mitotic chromosomes are characterized, and the rearrangements distinguishing the karyotypes of the taxa are inferred from arm homologies. The results were then converted into numerical data and submitted to cladistic analysis. The following conclusions were achieved: 1) Five karyotypic classes were observed, which correspond to the five taxa studied. Differences between them are as follows: a) Cebuella (2n = 44, 10 acrocentrics, A + 32 bi-armed autosomes, bi) and the argentata group (2n = 44, 10A + 32bi) are different from each other due to a reciprocal translocation; b) both can be distinguished from the jacchus group (2n = 46, 14A + 30bi) by a centric fusion/fission rearrangement and a paracentric inversion; c) Leontopithecus (2n = 46, 14A + 30bi) and Saguinus (2n = 46, 14A + 30bi) differ from the jacchus group by a reciprocal translocation and three paracentric inversions; and d) Saguinus is different from the others by one paracentric inversion and pericentric inversions in at least four pairs of acrocentric autosomes. 2) The cladistic analysis separates Cebus (used as an outgroup) from the Callitrichidae groups, which forms a clade. Among the Callitrichidae, marmosets (Cebuella and Callithrix) form a sub-clade, Cebuella and the argentata group being more closely related to each other than both are to the jacchus group. Tamarins (Leontopithecus and Saguinus) are also quite close, so that if one was not derived from the other, they with the marmosets share a common ancestor. Among the tamarins, Leontopithecus is karyotypically closest to the marmosets, specifically to the jacchus group. 3) Based on the chromosome information and considering the possible direction of the evolutionary changes (primitivity or phyletic dwarfism hypothesis, previously advanced by other authors), it was possible to propose the ancestral karyotypes and to develop two alternatives for the origin, differentiation and dispersion of the callitrichid. Both proposals are plausible, but when the geographical distribution is considered, the phyletic dwarfism hypothesis seems to be the most probable.
对110个标本进行了细胞遗传学和细胞分类学研究(G显带、C显带、连续G/C显带和核仁组织区显带),这些标本代表了绢毛猴科(Callitrichidae)南美灵长类的四个属:倭狨属(Cebuella,倭狨C. pygmaea)、狨属(Callithrix),银狨组(银狨C. argentata、埃氏狨C. emiliae、金头狨C. chrysoleuca、肩章狨C. humeralifera、马氏狨C. mauesi),以及柽柳猴组(白耳狨C. aurita、杰氏狨C. geoffroyi、普通狨C. jacchus、库氏狨C. kuhli、白领柽柳猴C. penicillata)、狮面狨属(Leontopithecus,金面狮面狨L. chrysomelas、金狮面狨L. rosalia),以及柽柳猴属(Saguinus,中美柽柳猴指名亚种S. midas midas、中美柽柳猴黑亚种S. m. niger)。对有丝分裂染色体进行了特征描述,并根据臂同源性推断出区分各分类单元核型的重排。然后将结果转化为数值数据并进行分支分析。得出以下结论:1)观察到五个核型类别,对应于所研究的五个分类单元。它们之间的差异如下:a)倭狨属(2n = 44,10条近端着丝粒染色体,A + 32条双臂常染色体,bi)和银狨组(2n = 44,10A + 32bi)因相互易位而彼此不同;b)两者均可通过着丝粒融合/裂变重排和臂内倒位与柽柳猴组(2n = 46,14A + 30bi)区分开来;c)狮面狨属(2n = 46,14A + 30bi)和柽柳猴属(2n = 46,14A + 30bi)与柽柳猴组的差异在于相互易位和三个臂内倒位;d)柽柳猴属与其他属的不同之处在于一个臂内倒位和至少四对近端着丝粒常染色体的着丝粒倒位。2)分支分析将卷尾猴属(用作外类群)与绢毛猴科各群体区分开来,绢毛猴科各群体形成一个分支。在绢毛猴科中,狨猴(倭狨属和狨属)形成一个亚分支,倭狨属和银狨组彼此之间的关系比它们与柽柳猴组的关系更密切。柽柳猴(狮面狨属和柽柳猴属)也相当接近,因此如果它们不是由彼此演化而来,那么它们与狨猴有共同的祖先。在柽柳猴中,狮面狨属在核型上最接近狨猴,特别是与柽柳猴组。3)基于染色体信息并考虑到进化变化的可能方向(其他作者先前提出的原始性或系统发育侏儒症假说),有可能提出祖先核型,并为绢毛猴科的起源、分化和扩散提出两种替代方案。两种方案都有合理性,但考虑到地理分布时,系统发育侏儒症假说似乎最有可能。