Ibbotson S H, Farr P M
Department of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
J Invest Dermatol. 1999 Sep;113(3):346-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00700.x.
The time-course for the development of ultraviolet A-induced erythema in psoralen-sensitized skin differs from that caused by ultraviolet B or ultraviolet A but objective data are not available. During psoralen ultraviolet A therapy, the minimal phototoxic dose is determined 72 h after exposure, when psoralen ultraviolet A erythema is assumed to be maximal. This measurement is of fundamental importance in optimizing the therapeutic regimen. We examined a detailed time-course for development of psoralen ultraviolet A erythema in 16 subjects. The erythemal responses to ultraviolet B, ultraviolet A and psoralen ultraviolet A were assessed visually and using a reflectance device. Ultraviolet B erythema was maximal 24 h after exposure compared with subsequent time-points. Psoralen ultraviolet A erythema was evident at 24 h, with reduction in the median ultraviolet A minimal erythema dose from 14 to 5 J per cm2 in the presence of psoralen (p < 0.01; n = 9). Peak psoralen ultraviolet A erythema, assessed by minimal phototoxic dose, did not occur until 96 h or later in 75% of subjects. Using individual dose- response curves, we determined that only 67% of mean maximum psoralen ultraviolet A erythemal intensity had developed by 72 h. Furthermore, at the time of maximal erythema, the slope of the psoralen ultraviolet A dose-response curve was approximately 2-fold shallower than that for ultraviolet B-induced erythema. If assessment of psoralen ultraviolet A erythemal sensitivity had been made at 96 h instead of the conventional 72 h time-point, peak erythemal responses would not have been missed in any of the subjects. Based on these findings, it seems appropriate to consider whether psoralen ultraviolet A minimal phototoxic dose measurements should be performed 96 h after exposure.
补骨脂素致敏皮肤中紫外线A诱导红斑的发展时间进程不同于紫外线B或紫外线A所致,但尚无客观数据。在补骨脂素紫外线A治疗期间,最小光毒性剂量在暴露72小时后测定,此时假定补骨脂素紫外线A红斑达到最大程度。该测量对于优化治疗方案至关重要。我们研究了16名受试者补骨脂素紫外线A红斑发展的详细时间进程。通过视觉和反射装置评估对紫外线B、紫外线A和补骨脂素紫外线A的红斑反应。与后续时间点相比,紫外线B红斑在暴露后24小时达到最大程度。补骨脂素紫外线A红斑在24小时时明显,在存在补骨脂素的情况下,紫外线A最小红斑剂量中位数从每平方厘米14焦耳降至5焦耳(p<0.01;n=9)。通过最小光毒性剂量评估,75%的受试者直到96小时或更晚才出现补骨脂素紫外线A红斑峰值。利用个体剂量反应曲线,我们确定到72小时时,仅67%的补骨脂素紫外线A平均最大红斑强度出现。此外,在红斑最大程度时,补骨脂素紫外线A剂量反应曲线的斜率比紫外线B诱导红斑的斜率约浅2倍。如果在96小时而非传统的72小时时间点评估补骨脂素紫外线A红斑敏感性,那么在任何受试者中都不会错过红斑峰值反应。基于这些发现,似乎有必要考虑补骨脂素紫外线A最小光毒性剂量测量是否应在暴露96小时后进行。