Al-Ismail D, Edwards C, Anstey A V
Department of Dermatology, St Woolos Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, NP20 2UB, U.K.
Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, U.K.
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Jan;174(1):131-5. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14101. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
Published methodology used to determine psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) erythemal action spectrum does not reflect current clinical practice for psoralen sensitization. We re-evaluated the PUVA action spectrum using aqueous 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) 2·6 mg L(-1) as used routinely in current clinical practice.
To determine the UVA erythema action spectrum of topical 8-MOP-sensitized normal skin.
Twenty healthy volunteers with skin phototypes I-V were recruited. Forearms were psoralen-sensitized at 37 °C for 10 min. Six UVA irradiations at 10-nm intervals between 325 and 375 nm were randomly allocated to forearm sites and were applied using a 10-nm bandwidth irradiation monochromator. The visual minimal phototoxic dose (MPD) was recorded on each site at 96 h.
Volunteer Boston phototypes were: I, n = 2; II, n = 6; III, n = 6; IV, n = 5 and V, n = 1. The mean MPD (J cm(-2) ) for all subjects at each wavelength was as follows: 325 nm, 0·64 (SD 0·37); 335 nm, 0·80 (SD 0·58); 345 nm, 0·96 (SD 0·55); 355 nm, 1·50 (SD 0·85); 365 nm, 2·19 (SD 0·90); and 375 nm, 2·89 (SD 1·06). Therefore, the relative sensitization at each wavelength (erythemal action spectrum) was: 1, 0·83, 0·67, 0·43, 0·29 and 0·22. There were significant differences between the PUVA erythemal effectiveness at different wavelengths but none between skin types.
This study has established the erythemal action spectrum for bath/soak PUVA therapy as is currently performed. In all volunteers, the peak sensitivity was at 325 nm. All volunteers showed a similar trend across the wavelengths studied irrespective of skin type. The determination of the action spectrum for PUVA-induced erythema is important as it permits reliable estimates of erythemal efficacy of any UVA source where the emission spectrum of the lamp is known or can be measured.
已发表的用于确定补骨脂素加紫外线A(PUVA)红斑作用光谱的方法并不能反映当前补骨脂素致敏的临床实践。我们使用当前临床实践中常规使用的2.6毫克/升的8-甲氧基补骨脂素(8-MOP)水溶液重新评估了PUVA作用光谱。
确定局部8-MOP致敏的正常皮肤的UVA红斑作用光谱。
招募了20名皮肤光型为I-V的健康志愿者。在前臂37°C下用补骨脂素致敏10分钟。在325至375纳米之间以10纳米间隔进行的六次UVA照射被随机分配到前臂部位,并使用10纳米带宽的照射单色仪进行照射。在96小时时记录每个部位的视觉最小光毒性剂量(MPD)。
志愿者的波士顿光型为:I型,n = 2;II型,n = 6;III型,n = 6;IV型,n = 5;V型,n = 1。每个波长下所有受试者的平均MPD(焦耳/平方厘米)如下:325纳米,0.64(标准差0.37);335纳米,0.80(标准差0.58);345纳米,0.96(标准差0.55);355纳米,1.50(标准差0.85);365纳米,2.19(标准差0.90);375纳米,2.89(标准差1.06)。因此,每个波长下的相对致敏率(红斑作用光谱)为:1、0.83、0.67、0.43、0.29和0.22。不同波长下的PUVA红斑有效性存在显著差异,但不同皮肤类型之间没有差异。
本研究确定了目前进行的浴用/浸泡用PUVA疗法的红斑作用光谱。在所有志愿者中,峰值敏感性在325纳米处。所有志愿者在研究的波长范围内均呈现相似趋势,与皮肤类型无关。确定PUVA诱导红斑的作用光谱很重要,因为它可以可靠地估计任何已知或可测量灯发射光谱的UVA光源的红斑疗效。