Suppr超能文献

终末期肾病儿童的营利性与非营利性透析治疗

For-profit versus not-for-profit dialysis care for children with end stage renal disease.

作者信息

Furth S L, Hwang W, Neu A M, Fivush B A, Powe N R

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Nephrology, the Department of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1999 Sep;104(3 Pt 1):519-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.3.519.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Over the last 2 decades, for-profit dialysis units have become the most common providers of renal replacement therapy for adults with end stage renal disease (ESRD) and have had an increasing role in the dialysis of children. We undertook a study to determine whether dialysis facility profit status influences the choice of dialysis therapy in the pediatric population.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of national data from the Health Care Financing Administration.

SETTING

Free-standing and hospital-based outpatient dialysis facilities in the United States.

PATIENTS

A total of 1568 children and adolescents (</=19 years of age) eligible for US Medicare ESRD benefits in 1994.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The association between dialysis modality choice and the profit status of the facility. Crude associations were estimated by the OR of a patient being treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) versus hemodialysis at nonprofit versus for-profit facilities. Adjusted associations were estimated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In bivariate analysis, children with ESRD dialyzed at nonprofit facilities were nearly three times as likely as those at for-profit facilities to be on PD (OR: 2.9; 95% CI: 2.3,3.6). In multivariate analysis, after controlling for patient age, sex, race, cause and duration of ESRD, free-standing versus hospital-based facility, and the pediatric expertise of the facility, patients at nonprofit facilities were more than twice as likely as those dialyzed at for-profit facilities to be on PD (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.6, 3.4). After taking into account the clustering of patients within facilities, the association between nonprofit status and the use of PD persisted (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5,3.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with ESRD treated at nonprofit facilities are more likely to receive PD than are those treated at for-profit facilities even after controlling for other patient and facility characteristics. This finding suggests that clinical decision making for pediatrics may be influenced by the ownership of the health care facility in which the patient is treated.

摘要

目的

在过去20年中,营利性透析单位已成为终末期肾病(ESRD)成年患者肾替代治疗最常见的提供者,并且在儿童透析中发挥着越来越重要的作用。我们开展了一项研究,以确定透析机构的营利状况是否会影响儿科患者透析治疗的选择。

设计

对医疗保健财务管理局的全国数据进行横断面研究。

地点

美国独立的和医院附属的门诊透析机构。

患者

1994年共有1568名符合美国医疗保险ESRD福利资格的儿童和青少年(年龄≤19岁)。

观察指标

透析方式选择与机构营利状况之间的关联。通过非营利性机构与营利性机构中接受腹膜透析(PD)与血液透析治疗的患者的比值比(OR)来估计粗略关联。使用逻辑回归分析估计校正后的关联。

结果

在双变量分析中,在非营利性机构接受透析的ESRD儿童接受PD治疗的可能性几乎是在营利性机构接受透析儿童的三倍(OR:2.9;95%可信区间:2.3,3.6)。在多变量分析中,在控制了患者年龄、性别、种族、ESRD的病因和病程、独立机构与医院附属机构以及机构的儿科专业知识后,非营利性机构的患者接受PD治疗的可能性是在营利性机构接受透析患者的两倍多(OR:2.3;95%可信区间:1.6,3.4)。在考虑了机构内患者的聚集情况后,非营利性状况与PD使用之间的关联仍然存在(OR:2.2;95%可信区间:1.5,3.2)。

结论

即使在控制了其他患者和机构特征之后,在非营利性机构接受治疗的ESRD儿童比在营利性机构接受治疗的儿童更有可能接受PD治疗。这一发现表明,儿科临床决策可能会受到患者接受治疗的医疗机构所有权的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验