Schlesinger M, Cleary P D, Blumenthal D
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3):244-58. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903000-00003.
The growth of investor-owned health care facilities raises questions about the relationship between profit seeking and medical decisionmaking. The authors compared the treatment received by patients with end-stage renal disease in private nonprofit, for-profit, and public facilities. Using data collected by the Health Care Financing Administration in 1981, they found that facility ownership had a significant independent effect on treatment of renal failure. In particular, patients at for-profit facilities were more likely to be dialyzed in the center and less likely to receive kidney transplants, home dialysis, or peritoneal dialysis than were their counterparts in nonprofit and public facilities. These findings persisted after controlling for characteristics of patients, the facility, and the local health care system, suggesting the need for further research and policy initiatives to deal with this issue.
投资者所有的医疗保健机构的增长引发了关于逐利与医疗决策之间关系的问题。作者比较了患有终末期肾病的患者在私立非营利性、营利性和公立机构所接受的治疗。利用医疗保健财务管理局在1981年收集的数据,他们发现机构所有权对肾衰竭的治疗有显著的独立影响。特别是,与非营利性和公立机构的患者相比,营利性机构的患者更有可能在中心进行透析,而接受肾脏移植、家庭透析或腹膜透析的可能性更小。在控制了患者、机构和当地医疗保健系统的特征后,这些发现依然存在,这表明需要进一步研究和采取政策举措来应对这一问题。