Ebert W, Muley T
Thoraxklinik Heidelberg-Rohrbach, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anticancer Res. 1999 Jul-Aug;19(4A):2669-72.
The introduction of new regimens in the chemotherapy of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients provides a useful extension of survival probability that may now justify the application of tumor markers for the disease monitoring. In a prospective study of 48 consecutive NSCLC patients with TNM stages IIIB/IV we compared changes in the serum levels of the cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21-1 with the clinical evaluations of response to therapy. CYFRA 21-1 levels were measured using the enzyme immunoassay of Boehringer, Mannheim (Germany). Clinical response to therapy was evaluated according to standard criteria of the WHO. For the assessment of response to therapy by changes in the marker levels the difference between two consecutive levels must exceed 30%. This value is based on the formula: Difference = 2 square root of 2 x CV (CV: inter-assay coefficient of variation of the marker test). CYFRA 21-1 was found to be elevated in 29/48 (60.4%) patients prior to therapy and in 10/48 (20.8%) patients at tumor progression. 91 evaluations have been recorded in these 39 patients. The overall concordance between changes in the marker levels and the clinical assessment was 59.3%. The decrease of CYFRA 21-1 levels at remission was rather low resulting in a concordance of only 42.9%, i.e. marker assays cannot replace the clinical restaging by imaging modalities. In contrast, changes in the marker levels at progression did exceed the required 30% in the majority of cases (64.7%). Most of discordant results (40.7%) could be explained by insufficient decrease or increase of CYFRA 21-1 levels or by extended lead-time. The most striking result was the detection of progressive disease by rising marker levels. Except one case, there was no false-positive elevation of CYFRA 21-1 levels. It is concluded that the detection of progressive disease by rising CYFRA 21-1 levels may avoid continuation of ineffective treatment.
在无法手术的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者化疗中引入新方案,可有效延长生存概率,这使得应用肿瘤标志物进行疾病监测成为可能。在一项对48例连续的TNM分期为IIIB/IV期的NSCLC患者的前瞻性研究中,我们比较了细胞角蛋白19片段CYFRA 21-1血清水平的变化与治疗反应的临床评估结果。CYFRA 21-1水平采用德国宝灵曼公司的酶免疫分析法进行检测。治疗的临床反应根据世界卫生组织的标准进行评估。为了通过标志物水平的变化评估治疗反应,连续两个水平之间的差异必须超过30%。该值基于公式:差异=2×2的平方根×CV(CV:标志物检测的批间变异系数)。发现CYFRA 21-1在29/48(60.4%)的患者治疗前升高,在10/48(20.8%)的肿瘤进展患者中升高。这39例患者共记录了91次评估。标志物水平变化与临床评估之间的总体一致性为59.3%。缓解期CYFRA 21-1水平的下降相当低,一致性仅为42.9%,即标志物检测不能替代影像学方法进行临床再分期。相比之下,大多数情况下(64.7%)进展期标志物水平的变化确实超过了所需的30%。大多数不一致的结果(约40.7%)可归因于CYFRA 21-1水平下降或升高不足或提前期延长。最显著的结果是通过标志物水平升高检测到疾病进展。除1例患者外,CYFRA 21-1水平没有假阳性升高。结论是,通过升高的CYFRA 21-1水平检测疾病进展可避免继续进行无效治疗。