Wenzel V, Lindner K H, Augenstein S, Voelckel W, Strohmenger H U, Prengel A W, Steinbach G
Department of Anesthesiology, Knappschaft-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1565-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00027.
Intravenous administration of vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be more effective than optimal doses of epinephrine. The main purpose of this study was to determine whether intraosseous vasopressin achieves serum drug levels comparable with intravenous doses during CPR and, additionally, to evaluate the effects of intraosseous vasopressin during CPR.
Prospective, randomized laboratory investigation using an established porcine model with instrumentation for measurement of hemodynamic variables, blood gases, and return of spontaneous circulation.
University hospital laboratory.
Twelve domestic pigs.
After 4 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation and 3 mins of CPR, 12 pigs were randomized to be treated with intravenous administration of vasopressin (0.8 unit/kg vasopressin; n = 6) or intraosseous vasopressin (0.8 unit/kg vasopressin; n = 6). Defibrillation was performed 5 mins after drug administration to attempt the return of spontaneous circulation.
At both 90 secs and 5 mins after drug administration, intravenous and intraosseous administration of vasopressin resulted in comparable mean (+/-SEM) coronary perfusion pressure (43+/-4 vs. 44+/-3 and 30+/-2 vs. 37+/-2 mm Hg, respectively) and vasopressin plasma concentrations (13,706+/-1,857 vs. 16,166+/-3,114 pg/mL and 10,372+/-883 vs. 8246+/-2211 pg/mL, respectively). All animals in both groups were successfully resuscitated; pigs that received intraosseous vasopressin had a significantly higher (p < .05) mean arterial (92+/-6 vs. 129+/-12 mm Hg) and coronary perfusion pressure (84+/-11 vs. 119+/-11 mm Hg) at 5 mins of return of spontaneous circulation.
Intraosseous vasopressin resulted in comparable vasopressin plasma levels, hemodynamic variables, and return of spontaneous circulation rates as did intravenous vasopressin. Intraosseous vasopressin may be an alternative for vasopressor administration during CPR, when intravenous access is delayed or not available.
在心肺复苏(CPR)期间静脉注射血管加压素可能比最佳剂量的肾上腺素更有效。本研究的主要目的是确定在CPR期间骨内注射血管加压素是否能达到与静脉注射剂量相当的血清药物水平,并评估CPR期间骨内注射血管加压素的效果。
采用成熟的猪模型进行前瞻性、随机实验室研究,该模型配备用于测量血流动力学变量、血气和自主循环恢复的仪器。
大学医院实验室。
12头家猪。
在4分钟未经处理的室颤和3分钟CPR后,将12头猪随机分为两组,分别接受静脉注射血管加压素(0.8单位/千克血管加压素;n = 6)或骨内注射血管加压素(0.8单位/千克血管加压素;n = 6)。给药5分钟后进行除颤,试图恢复自主循环。
给药后90秒和5分钟时,静脉注射和骨内注射血管加压素导致的平均(±标准误)冠状动脉灌注压相当(分别为43±4与44±3以及30±2与37±2毫米汞柱),血管加压素血浆浓度也相当(分别为13,706±1,857与16,166±3,114皮克/毫升以及10,372±883与8246±2211皮克/毫升)。两组所有动物均成功复苏;在自主循环恢复5分钟时,接受骨内注射血管加压素的猪的平均动脉压(92±6与129±12毫米汞柱)和冠状动脉灌注压(84±11与119±11毫米汞柱)显著更高(p <.05)。
骨内注射血管加压素导致的血管加压素血浆水平、血流动力学变量和自主循环恢复率与静脉注射血管加压素相当。当静脉通路延迟或无法建立时,骨内注射血管加压素可能是CPR期间血管升压药给药的一种替代方法。