• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供认能力:衡量智力迟钝被告的理解能力和受暗示性

Competence to confess: measuring understanding and suggestibility of defendants with mental retardation.

作者信息

Everington C, Fulero S M

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.

出版信息

Ment Retard. 1999 Jun;37(3):212-20. doi: 10.1352/0047-6765(1999)037<0212:CTCMUA>2.0.CO;2.

DOI:10.1352/0047-6765(1999)037<0212:CTCMUA>2.0.CO;2
PMID:10473340
Abstract

Groups of individuals with or without mental retardation, all of whom were currently on probation, were tested with measures of comprehension of Miranda rights and of suggestibility. As in previous work, participants with mental retardation were found to be less able to comprehend their Miranda rights. In addition, they were significantly more likely to respond to suggestive questioning and to change their answers. Significant correlations were found between measures of comprehension of Miranda rights and measures of suggestibility. Implications of these results were discussed.

摘要

对正在缓刑期的有或没有智力障碍的个体群体进行了米兰达权利理解能力和易受暗示性的测试。与之前的研究一样,发现有智力障碍的参与者对米兰达权利的理解能力较差。此外,他们对暗示性提问做出回应并改变答案的可能性要大得多。在米兰达权利理解能力测试结果与易受暗示性测试结果之间发现了显著的相关性。讨论了这些结果的意义。

相似文献

1
Competence to confess: measuring understanding and suggestibility of defendants with mental retardation.供认能力:衡量智力迟钝被告的理解能力和受暗示性
Ment Retard. 1999 Jun;37(3):212-20. doi: 10.1352/0047-6765(1999)037<0212:CTCMUA>2.0.CO;2.
2
Miranda comprehension in adults with mental retardation and the effects of feedback style on suggestibility.智力迟钝成年人的米兰达理解能力以及反馈方式对易受暗示性的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2005 Jun;29(3):359-69. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-2965-y.
3
Examining the role of interrogative suggestibility in Miranda rights comprehension in adolescents.考察青少年在理解米兰达权利时的询问暗示性的作用。
Law Hum Behav. 2011 Jun;35(3):165-77. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9198-4.
4
Adjudicative competence and comprehension of Miranda rights in adolescent defendants: a comparison of legal standards.青少年被告的审判能力及对米兰达权利的理解:法律标准比较
Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(1):1-19. doi: 10.1002/bsl.714.
5
A critical review of published competency-to-confess measures.已发表的供述能力测评方法的批判性综述。
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Dec;28(6):707-18; discussion 719-24. doi: 10.1007/s10979-004-0794-z.
6
Psychiatric patients' comprehension of Miranda rights.精神病患者对米兰达权利的理解。
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Oct;32(5):390-405. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9099-3. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
7
Development and initial validation of the Miranda vocabulary scale.米拉达词汇量表的编制与初步验证。
Law Hum Behav. 2009 Oct;33(5):381-92. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9159-3. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
8
Evaluations of capacity to waive Miranda rights: a survey of practitioners' use of the Grisso instruments.放弃米兰达权利能力的评估:对从业者使用格里索工具的调查。
Assessment. 2007 Sep;14(3):300-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191110730284.
9
Eyewitness memory and suggestibility in children with mental retardation.智力迟钝儿童的目击证人记忆与易受暗示性
Am J Ment Retard. 1999 Nov;104(6):491-508. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(1999)104<0491:EMASIC>2.0.CO;2.
10
Forcible medication of mentally ill criminal defendants: the case of Russell Eugene Weston, Jr.对患有精神疾病的刑事被告进行强制药物治疗:小拉塞尔·尤金·韦斯顿案
Stanford Law Rev. 2002 Apr;54(4):769-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Influences on understanding of a verbally presented police caution amongst adults involved in the criminal justice system: a systematic review.对参与刑事司法系统的成年人理解口头传达的警方告诫的影响:一项系统综述。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 11;28(1):70-93. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1767711. eCollection 2021.
2
The Scottish police caution: do individuals with intellectual disabilities understand a verbally presented police caution, and can comprehension be improved?苏格兰警方警告:智障人士是否理解口头给出的警方警告,以及理解能力能否得到提高?
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 4;28(1):50-69. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1767710. eCollection 2021.