• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏外科手术患者的气管切开术:手术气管切开术与齐亚利亚法和法托尼奥法对比

Tracheostomy in cardiosurgical patients: surgical tracheostomy versus ciaglia and fantoni methods.

作者信息

Westphal K, Byhahn C, Rinne T, Wilke H J, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Lischke V

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, J.W. Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Aug;68(2):486-92. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00565-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00565-2
PMID:10475417
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation are not uncommon in a cardiosurgical intensive care unit. Elective tracheostomy is considered the airway treatment of choice in these patients.

METHODS

To evaluate different techniques for tracheostomy, we prospectively investigated 120 patients who had conventional open (n = 40), minimally invasive percutaneous dilatational (n = 40), or translaryngeal (n = 40) tracheostomy techniques. The main areas of investigation included oxygenation index (partial pressure of arterial oxygen divided by fraction of inspired oxygen), complications, infection, and cost.

RESULTS

The oxygenation index decreased in almost every patient, regardless of the technique used, but the extent of decrease was significantly lower in both minimally invasive techniques compared with the conventional method. Overall complication rate was 12.5% both in open tracheostomy and in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, whereas no complications occurred in translaryngeal tracheostomy procedures. Bacterial contamination of the tracheostomy site was found in 35% of the open tracheostomies, whereas no infection was seen in percutaneous dilatational or translaryngeal tracheostomies. In terms of costs, PDT ($506) and TLT ($362) were both much cheaper than open tracheostomy ($699).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous dilatational and translaryngeal tracheostomies are safe and cost-effective procedures that can be done easily at the patient's bedside and thus are attractive alternatives to conventional surgical tracheostomy in long-term airway access in a cardiosurgical intensive care unit.

摘要

背景

在心脏外科重症监护病房,需要长期机械通气的患者并不少见。择期气管切开术被认为是这些患者气道治疗的首选方法。

方法

为评估不同的气管切开术技术,我们前瞻性地研究了120例接受传统开放气管切开术(n = 40)、微创经皮扩张气管切开术(n = 40)或经喉气管切开术(n = 40)的患者。主要研究领域包括氧合指数(动脉血氧分压除以吸入氧分数)、并发症、感染和成本。

结果

几乎每位患者的氧合指数均下降,无论采用何种技术,但与传统方法相比,两种微创技术的下降程度均显著更低。开放气管切开术和经皮扩张气管切开术的总体并发症发生率均为12.5%,而经喉气管切开术未发生并发症。35%的开放气管切开术患者出现气管切开部位细菌污染,而经皮扩张气管切开术或经喉气管切开术未见感染。在成本方面,经皮扩张气管切开术(506美元)和经喉气管切开术(362美元)均比开放气管切开术(699美元)便宜得多。

结论

经皮扩张气管切开术和经喉气管切开术是安全且具有成本效益的手术,可在患者床边轻松完成,因此在心脏外科重症监护病房的长期气道通路建立方面,是传统外科气管切开术有吸引力的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Tracheostomy in cardiosurgical patients: surgical tracheostomy versus ciaglia and fantoni methods.心脏外科手术患者的气管切开术:手术气管切开术与齐亚利亚法和法托尼奥法对比
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Aug;68(2):486-92. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00565-2.
2
Percutaneous tracheostomy: a clinical comparison of dilatational (Ciaglia) and translaryngeal (Fantoni) techniques.经皮气管切开术:扩张法(Ciaglia法)与经喉法(Fantoni法)的临床比较
Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):938-43. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00022.
3
[Percutaneous tracheotomy in intensive care. Practicability and early complications of the translaryngeal Fantoni technique].[重症监护中的经皮气管切开术。经喉Fantoni技术的实用性及早期并发症]
Anaesthesist. 1999 May;48(5):310-6. doi: 10.1007/s001010050706.
4
Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy: clinical comparison of Griggs and Fantoni techniques.床旁经皮气管切开术:Griggs技术与Fantoni技术的临床比较
World J Surg. 2001 Mar;25(3):296-301. doi: 10.1007/s002680020087.
5
[Puncture tracheostomy versus translaryngeal tracheostomy. A prospective randomized study of 50 intensive care patients].经皮气管切开术与经喉气管切开术。对50例重症监护患者的前瞻性随机研究
Chirurg. 1998 Apr;69(4):418-22. doi: 10.1007/s001040050432.
6
Fantoni translaryngeal tracheostomy versus ciaglia blue rhino percutaneous tracheostomy: a retrospective comparison.经 Fantoni 经声门气管造口术与 ciaglia blue rhino 经皮气管造口术的回顾性比较。
Surg Today. 2009;39(5):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-3899-z. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
7
Rationale for 'early' percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in patients with burn injuries.烧伤患者“早期”经皮扩张气管切开术的理论依据。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1997 Sep-Oct;18(5):424-8. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199709000-00010.
8
Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术与外科气管切开术的安全性及成本比较。
Am Surg. 2001 Jan;67(1):54-60.
9
Augmented Reality-Assisted Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Patients With Chronic Respiratory Disease.增强现实辅助经皮扩张气管切开术在慢性呼吸系统疾病危重症患者中的应用。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Feb;34(2):153-155. doi: 10.1177/0885066618791952. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
10
[Translaryngeal tracheostomy. Technique and initial results].[经喉气管切开术。技术与初步结果]
Chirurg. 1997 May;68(5):531-5. doi: 10.1007/s001040050225.

引用本文的文献

1
Introducing a new instrument "Downpipe endotracheal tube" for improving the safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.介绍一种用于提高经皮扩张气管切开术安全性的新型器械“下呼吸道气管导管”。
J Res Med Sci. 2020 Feb 20;25:16. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_569_19. eCollection 2020.
2
Does percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy increase the incidence of sternal wound infection - a single center retrospective of 4100 cases.经皮扩张气管切开术会增加胸骨伤口感染的发生率吗?——一项对4100例病例的单中心回顾性研究
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Nov 6;10:155. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0365-z.
3
Surgical versus percutaneous tracheostomy: an evidence-based approach.
手术与经皮气管切开术:循证方法。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar;268(3):323-30. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1398-5. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
4
Tracheal stenosis aftertracheostomy or intubation: review with special regard to cause and management.气管切开术或插管术后的气管狭窄:关于病因及处理的综述
Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32(2):154-8.
5
A single-center 8-year experience with percutaneous dilational tracheostomy.单中心8年经皮扩张气管切开术经验。
Ann Surg. 2000 May;231(5):701-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200005000-00010.