• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烧伤患者“早期”经皮扩张气管切开术的理论依据。

Rationale for 'early' percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in patients with burn injuries.

作者信息

Caruso D M, al-Kasspooles M F, Matthews M R, Weiland D E, Schiller W R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Rehabil. 1997 Sep-Oct;18(5):424-8. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199709000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00004630-199709000-00010
PMID:9313124
Abstract

Several investigators have cited the numerous complications that occur with conventional tracheostomies in patients with burn injuries. However, none of these studies included the technique of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, which has been shown to significantly decrease operative time, cost, perioperative, and long-term sequelae as compared to conventional tracheostomy. A retrospective analysis of 36 patients with burn injuries, from 1400 burn admissions, was conducted to compare conventional tracheostomy versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. In this study, percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy resulted in significantly decreased operative times and cost compared to conventional tracheostomy. There were no major operative complications in either group, and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradients were improved in 71% of the patients with a tracheostomy. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is an efficacious technique for airway management in patients with burn injuries. It can be safely performed at the bedside, at one fourth the cost of a conventional tracheostomy. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy may also benefit the patient with severe burns by decreasing alveolar-arterial oxygen gradients. Improved ventilatory mechanics might allow for a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, thereby decreasing patient morbidity, hospital stay, and cost.

摘要

几位研究者列举了烧伤患者进行传统气管切开术时出现的诸多并发症。然而,这些研究均未涉及经皮扩张气管切开术,与传统气管切开术相比,经皮扩张气管切开术已被证明可显著缩短手术时间、降低成本、减少围手术期及长期后遗症。对1400例烧伤入院患者中的36例进行了回顾性分析,以比较传统气管切开术与经皮扩张气管切开术。在本研究中,与传统气管切开术相比,经皮扩张气管切开术显著缩短了手术时间并降低了成本。两组均未出现重大手术并发症,71%行气管切开术的患者肺泡 - 动脉氧梯度得到改善。经皮扩张气管切开术是烧伤患者气道管理的一种有效技术。它可在床边安全实施,成本仅为传统气管切开术的四分之一。经皮扩张气管切开术还可能通过降低肺泡 - 动脉氧梯度使重度烧伤患者受益。改善的通气力学可能使机械通气时间缩短,从而降低患者发病率、住院时间和成本。

相似文献

1
Rationale for 'early' percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in patients with burn injuries.烧伤患者“早期”经皮扩张气管切开术的理论依据。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1997 Sep-Oct;18(5):424-8. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199709000-00010.
2
Percutaneous versus Conventional Tracheostomy in Burned Patients with Inhalation Injury.吸入性损伤烧伤患者的经皮与传统气管切开术对比研究
World J Surg. 2005 Dec;29(12):1571-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7905-y.
3
Open versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: efficacy and cost analysis.开放性与经皮扩张气管切开术:疗效与成本分析
Am Surg. 2001 Apr;67(4):297-301; discussion 301-2.
4
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A safe, cost-effective bedside procedure.经皮扩张气管切开术。一种安全、经济高效的床边操作。
Arch Surg. 1996 Mar;131(3):265-71. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430150043008.
5
The long-term complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.经皮扩张气管切开术的远期并发症
Am Surg. 1998 Jan;64(1):82-6; discussion 86-7.
6
Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术与外科气管切开术的安全性及成本比较。
Am Surg. 2001 Jan;67(1):54-60.
7
Tracheostomy in cardiosurgical patients: surgical tracheostomy versus ciaglia and fantoni methods.心脏外科手术患者的气管切开术:手术气管切开术与齐亚利亚法和法托尼奥法对比
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Aug;68(2):486-92. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00565-2.
8
Augmented Reality-Assisted Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Patients With Chronic Respiratory Disease.增强现实辅助经皮扩张气管切开术在慢性呼吸系统疾病危重症患者中的应用。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Feb;34(2):153-155. doi: 10.1177/0885066618791952. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
9
Impact of real-time ultrasound guidance on complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a propensity score analysis.实时超声引导对经皮扩张气管切开术并发症的影响:一项倾向评分分析。
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 29;19(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0924-7.
10
Clinical experience with percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: report of 150 cases.经皮扩张气管切开术的临床经验:150例报告。
Eur J Surg. 1996 Jul;162(7):531-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Ventilation strategies in burn intensive care: A retrospective observational study.烧伤重症监护中的通气策略:一项回顾性观察研究。
Burns Trauma. 2014 Jan 26;2(1):29-35. doi: 10.4103/2321-3868.126090. eCollection 2014.
2
Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术与外科气管切开术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 20;7(7):CD008045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008045.pub2.
3
A Survey of Mechanical Ventilator Practices Across Burn Centers in North America.北美烧伤中心机械通气实践调查
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Mar-Apr;37(2):e131-9. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000270.
4
Percutaneous versus Conventional Tracheostomy in Burned Patients with Inhalation Injury.吸入性损伤烧伤患者的经皮与传统气管切开术对比研究
World J Surg. 2005 Dec;29(12):1571-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7905-y.