• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠36周后未进行宫缩抑制剂治疗的外倒转术结局

Outcome of external cephalic version after 36 weeks' gestation without tocolysis.

作者信息

Impey L, Lissoni D

机构信息

The Women's Center, The Oxford Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, UK.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Med. 1999 Sep-Oct;8(5):203-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199909/10)8:5<203::AID-MFM1>3.0.CO;2-Y.

DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199909/10)8:5<203::AID-MFM1>3.0.CO;2-Y
PMID:10475501
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite its efficacy, external cephalic version (ECV) at term is not universally employed. Published series of Caucasian women are small and concerns regarding safety and spontaneous version remain. We review the outcomes of 26 months of a breech clinic in a Dublin teaching hospital.

METHODS

All women with known breech presentation at 36+ weeks were referred unless another indication for cesarean section existed. Unstable lie, fetal compromise, antepartum hemorrhage, and patient refusal were the only contraindications to ECV. One operator attempted all versions, without tocolysis.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy women were referred and in 356 (95%), version was attempted at a mean gestation of 37 + 3 weeks; 195 (55%) were nulliparous and 161 (45%) were multiparous. The success rate was 43%, including 33% of nulliparous and 54% of multiparous women. There were three perinatal deaths (0.8%), all unrelated to the version. Minor complications were rare, although two women were delivered by cesarean section shortly after unsuccessful version. Ninety-three percent of successful versions were cephalic at delivery, as were 4% of unsuccessful versions; 12% of infants with a cephalic presentation after successful version were delivered by cesarean section.

CONCLUSIONS

From this large series, ECV is extremely safe. Spontaneous version after unsuccessful ECV and reversion after successful ECV are unusual.

摘要

目的

尽管足月外倒转术(ECV)有效,但并未被广泛应用。已发表的关于白人女性的系列研究规模较小,且对其安全性和自然倒转仍存在担忧。我们回顾了都柏林一家教学医院26个月臀位门诊的结果。

方法

所有孕36 + 周已知为臀位的孕妇,除非存在剖宫产的其他指征,均被转诊。胎位不稳、胎儿窘迫、产前出血和患者拒绝是ECV的唯一禁忌证。由一名操作人员尝试所有的倒转术,不使用宫缩抑制剂。

结果

370名孕妇被转诊,其中356名(95%)在平均孕周37 + 3周时尝试倒转术;195名(55%)为初产妇,161名(45%)为经产妇。成功率为43%,其中初产妇为33%,经产妇为54%。围产期死亡3例(0.8%),均与倒转术无关。轻微并发症很少见,尽管有两名女性在倒转术失败后不久行剖宫产分娩。93%的成功倒转术在分娩时转为头位,失败倒转术中4%转为头位;成功倒转术后转为头位的婴儿中有12%通过剖宫产分娩。

结论

从这个大样本系列研究来看,ECV极其安全。ECV失败后的自然倒转和成功后的复转都不常见。

相似文献

1
Outcome of external cephalic version after 36 weeks' gestation without tocolysis.妊娠36周后未进行宫缩抑制剂治疗的外倒转术结局
J Matern Fetal Med. 1999 Sep-Oct;8(5):203-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199909/10)8:5<203::AID-MFM1>3.0.CO;2-Y.
2
External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.使用沙丁胺醇进行外倒转术——成功率及成功的预测因素
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Feb;19(2):91-4.
3
[Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].[实施改良头位转位方案后臀位分娩减少]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A63.
4
Efficacy of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy.妊娠晚期应用宫缩抑制剂行外倒转术的疗效
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jan;91(1):19-24.
5
Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.足月臀位重复外倒转术中的宫缩抑制:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
BJOG. 2005 May;112(5):627-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00518.x.
6
External cephalic version in singleton pregnancies at term: a retrospective analysis.足月单胎妊娠的外倒转术:一项回顾性分析
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;66(1):18-21. doi: 10.1159/000114251. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
7
External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature.既往有剖宫产史女性的外倒转术:36例报告及文献复习
J Perinat Med. 2009;37(2):156-60. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.006.
8
Impact of parity on obstetric and neonatal outcome of external cephalic version.产次对外倒转术产科及新生儿结局的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Aug;27(6):580-4. doi: 10.1080/01443610701469586.
9
Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery.既往有剖宫产史女性行外倒转术的安全性和有效性。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Feb;142(2):111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.08.012. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
10
Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.奥克兰外倒转术的应用取得了成功,但存在局限性。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Oct;48(5):467-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00889.x.

引用本文的文献

1
External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.足月臀位的外倒转术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 1;2015(4):CD000083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000083.pub3.
2
Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.外倒转术用于足月臀位分娩的成本效益分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Jan 21;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-3.