• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放供体肾切除术:比较受体输尿管并发症并改进腹腔镜技术

Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique.

作者信息

Philosophe B, Kuo P C, Schweitzer E J, Farney A C, Lim J W, Johnson L B, Jacobs S, Flowers J L, Cho E S, Bartlett S T

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore 21201, USA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 1999 Aug 27;68(4):497-502. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199908270-00009.

DOI:10.1097/00007890-199908270-00009
PMID:10480406
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN) is a recently developed procedure, the performance of which needs to be studied. Given the reported advantages in the donors, this study looks at graft outcome and ureteral complications in recipients of kidneys procured by open donor nephrectomy (ODN) versus LDN.

METHODS

The LDN recipients consisted of 193 patients since 3/27/96. A total of 168 ODN recipients from 1991 to 1998 served as controls. Immunosuppression protocols were similar for both groups.

RESULTS

Two-year graft survival for LDN and ODN was 98% and 96%, respectively. Two-year patient survival for LDN and ODN was 98% and 97%, respectively. The incidence of delayed graft function and mean serum creatinine at 3 and 12 months was similar in both groups. However, the number of ureteral complications that required operative repair was significantly higher for LDN recipients compared to ODN recipients, 7.7% (n=15) vs. 0.6% (n=1) respectively (P=0.03). Ureteral stenting was required in an additional 3.1% (n=6) of LDN and 2.4% (n=4) of ODN (P=NS). There was, however, a learning curve with time. For the first 130 LDN patients, a total of 20 ureteral complications were recorded, whereas only one occurred in the more recent 63 patients (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The higher ureteral complication rate in LDN recipients has improved over time as technical causes have been identified. We have noted significant improvement in ureteral viability by using the endogastrointestinal anastomosis instrument on the ureter and peri-ureteral tissue. LDN is therefore an excellent alternative to ODN. Identification of hazards unique to this technique is critical before its broader application.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜活体供肾切除术(LDN)是一项最近才开展的手术,其操作情况有待研究。鉴于该手术对供体有诸多已报道的优势,本研究观察了接受开放供肾切除术(ODN)与LDN获取的肾脏的受者的移植肾结局及输尿管并发症情况。

方法

自1996年3月27日起,LDN受者共193例。1991年至1998年的168例ODN受者作为对照。两组的免疫抑制方案相似。

结果

LDN和ODN的移植肾2年生存率分别为98%和96%。LDN和ODN的患者2年生存率分别为98%和97%。两组延迟移植肾功能的发生率以及3个月和12个月时的平均血清肌酐水平相似。然而,LDN受者中需要手术修复的输尿管并发症数量显著高于ODN受者,分别为7.7%(n = 15)和0.6%(n = 1)(P = 0.03)。另外,LDN组有3.1%(n = 6)、ODN组有2.4%(n = 4)的患者需要输尿管支架置入(P = 无显著差异)。不过,随着时间推移存在学习曲线。在前130例LDN患者中,共记录到20例输尿管并发症,而在最近的63例患者中仅发生1例(P = 0.03)。

结论

随着技术问题得到明确,LDN受者较高的输尿管并发症发生率已随时间有所改善。我们注意到,通过使用消化道内吻合器械处理输尿管及输尿管周围组织,输尿管的活力有了显著改善。因此,LDN是ODN的一个极佳替代方案。在更广泛应用该技术之前,识别其独特的风险至关重要。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique.腹腔镜与开放供体肾切除术:比较受体输尿管并发症并改进腹腔镜技术
Transplantation. 1999 Aug 27;68(4):497-502. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199908270-00009.
2
Fate of donor kidney: laparoscopic versus open technique.供体肾的转归:腹腔镜技术与开放技术对比
J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2326-30. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000144716.30222.12.
3
Long-term outcomes of living donor kidney transplants in pediatric recipients following laparoscopic vs. open donor nephrectomy.小儿受者接受腹腔镜与开放供肾肾切除术后活体供肾肾移植的长期预后
Pediatr Transplant. 2012 Dec;16(8):894-900. doi: 10.1111/petr.12008.
4
Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: ureteral complications in recipients.腹腔镜与开放供体肾切除术:受者的输尿管并发症
Urology. 2004 Jan;63(1):36-9; discussion 39-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.07.025.
5
Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放性供肾切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2005 Apr;95(6):851-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05415.x.
6
Laparoscopic v open donor nephrectomy for pediatric kidney recipients: preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial.小儿肾移植受者接受腹腔镜与开放供体肾切除术:一项随机对照试验的初步报告。
J Endourol. 2007 Sep;21(9):1033-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0208.
7
Development of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a strategy to increase living kidney donation incentive and maintain equivalent donor/recipient outcome.腹腔镜供肾切除术的发展:一种增加活体肾捐献动机并维持供体/受体等效结局的策略。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2009 Feb;108(2):135-45. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60044-9.
8
Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open technique and how to reach quality standards: a single-center experience in Thailand.腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术:与开放手术技术的比较以及如何达到质量标准:泰国单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2011 Dec;43(10):3593-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.115.
9
Evolution of Living Donor Nephrectomy at a Single Center: Long-term Outcomes With 4 Different Techniques in Greater Than 4000 Donors Over 50 Years.单中心活体供肾切除术的演变:50 多年来 4000 多例供体采用 4 种不同技术的长期结果。
Transplantation. 2016 Jun;100(6):1299-305. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001251.
10
Ureteral complications in the renal transplant recipient after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy.腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术后肾移植受者的输尿管并发症
Eur Urol. 2006 Sep;50(3):535-40; discussion 540-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.03.025. Epub 2006 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
From Lumbotomy to Robotic surgery: Narrative review of comparative studies of Surgical techniques in living donor nephrectomy.从腰部切开手术到机器人手术:活体供肾肾切除术外科技术比较研究的叙述性综述
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04611-1.
2
Risk Factors for Urologic Complications After Kidney Transplantation and Impact in Graft Survival.肾移植术后泌尿系统并发症的危险因素及其对移植物存活的影响。
Res Rep Urol. 2022 Sep 28;14:327-337. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S371851. eCollection 2022.
3
Post-Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Donor Nephrectomy Ipsilateral Testicular Pain, Does Operative Technique Matter? A Single Center Experience and Review of Literature.
腹腔镜下单点供体肾切除术术后同侧睾丸疼痛,手术技术重要吗?单中心经验及文献综述
Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Mar 23;2022:3292048. doi: 10.1155/2022/3292048. eCollection 2022.
4
Risk Factors for Anastomosis Leakage After Kidney Transplantation.肾移植术后吻合口漏的危险因素
Res Rep Urol. 2020 Oct 28;12:509-516. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S272899. eCollection 2020.
5
Preoperative assessment system for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy by discriminant analysis.应用判别分析的手助腹腔镜供肾切取术术前评估系统。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0227546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227546. eCollection 2020.
6
Early urological complications after kidney transplantation: An overview.肾移植术后早期泌尿系统并发症:综述
World J Transplant. 2018 Sep 10;8(5):142-149. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v8.i5.142.
7
Prevention of Orchialgia After Left-Sided Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy-A Prospective Study.左侧腹腔镜供体肾切除术后睾丸痛的预防——一项前瞻性研究
J Endourol. 2015 Jun;29(6):696-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0645. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
8
Comparison of the laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: an overview of surgical complications and outcome.腹腔镜与开放活体供肾切除术的比较:手术并发症及结果概述
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jun;399(5):543-51. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1196-4. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
9
Impact of ureteral length on urological complications and patient survival after kidney transplantation.输尿管长度对肾移植术后泌尿系统并发症及患者生存的影响。
Nephrourol Mon. 2013 Sep;5(4):878-83. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.10881. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
10
Is early removal of prophylactic ureteric stents beneficial in live donor renal transplantation?预防性输尿管支架早期取出对活体供肾肾移植有益吗?
Indian J Nephrol. 2012 Jul;22(4):275-9. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.101247.