Rosenberg L, MacNeil P, Turcotte L
Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center and Montreal General Hospital Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Gastrointest Surg. 1999 May-Jun;3(3):225-32. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80064-x.
Recent studies have concluded that octreotide can prevent complications in patients undergoing pancreatic resections. Given the acquisition cost of octreotide, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to establish whether if the additional cost associated with its use was justified by a decrease in the consumption of other resources. To evaluate success rates and complication rates, a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials was conducted. The rates for pancreatic fistula and fluid collection were 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9 to 13.4) and 3.6% (95% CI 1.9 to 5.2) for octreotide vs. 23.4% (95% CI 19.7 to 27. 1) and 8.8% (95% CI 6.2 to 11.3) for placebo. In a second phase we evaluated the treatment cost for patients with and without complications using two different models of cost savings. In the first model the cost to treat a pancreatic fistula was calculated as the per diem rate (as determined by Statistics Canada) multiplied by the incremental length of stay associated with the complication. In the second model we used data from institutions participating in the Ontario Case Costing Project. In model 1 the estimated incremental length of hospital stay attributed to a pancreatic fistula was 7 days, based on a review of the literature, and the per diem was $552. In model 2 the average cost of care for patients with or without complication was $32,347 (n = 17; 95% CI $20,882 to $43,812) and $11, 169 (n = 18; 95% CI $7558 to $14,779), respectively. The data suggest that when compared to placebo, octreotide is a dominant treatment strategy. In model 1, in a cohort of 100 patients, octreotide saved an average of $853 per patient while allowing 16 incremental patients to avoid complications. In model 2 use of octreotide resulted in an average savings of $1642 per patient while still allowing 16 patients to avoid complications. Detailed one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses suggest that both models were robust. The use of octreotide is a cost-effective strategy in patients undergoing elective pancreatic resection. Consideration should be given to extending its use to patients who are at high risk for development of complications following pancreatic surgery and who do not have any contraindications to the use of this drug.
近期研究得出结论,奥曲肽可预防接受胰腺切除术患者的并发症。鉴于奥曲肽的购置成本,进行了一项成本效益分析,以确定其使用所带来的额外成本是否因其他资源消耗的减少而合理。为评估成功率和并发症发生率,对双盲、随机、对照临床试验进行了荟萃分析。奥曲肽组的胰瘘发生率和积液发生率分别为10.7%(95%置信区间[CI]为7.9%至13.4%)和3.6%(95%CI为1.9%至5.2%),而安慰剂组分别为23.4%(95%CI为19.7%至27.1%)和8.8%(95%CI为6.2%至11.3%)。在第二阶段,我们使用两种不同的成本节约模型评估了有并发症和无并发症患者的治疗成本。在第一个模型中,治疗胰瘘的成本计算为每日费用率(由加拿大统计局确定)乘以与并发症相关的住院时间增量。在第二个模型中,我们使用了参与安大略病例成本核算项目的机构的数据。在模型1中,根据文献综述,归因于胰瘘的估计住院时间增量为7天,每日费用为552美元。在模型2中,有并发症和无并发症患者的平均护理成本分别为32347美元(n = 17;95%CI为20882美元至43812美元)和11169美元(n = 18;95%CI为7558美元至14779美元)。数据表明,与安慰剂相比,奥曲肽是一种优势治疗策略。在模型1中,在100名患者的队列中,奥曲肽平均每位患者节省853美元,同时使16名额外患者避免并发症。在模型2中,使用奥曲肽导致每位患者平均节省1642美元,同时仍使16名患者避免并发症。详细的单向和双向敏感性分析表明,两个模型都很稳健。在接受择期胰腺切除术的患者中,使用奥曲肽是一种具有成本效益的策略。应考虑将其应用扩展到胰腺手术后发生并发症风险高且无该药物使用禁忌证的患者。