van Duijvendijk P, Vasen H F, Bertario L, Bülow S, Kuijpers J H, Schouten W R, Guillem J G, Taat C W, Slors J F
Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Gastrointest Surg. 1999 May-Jun;3(3):325-30. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80075-4.
Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is performed in an increasing number of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Two techniques are currently used to construct an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: (1) a double-stapled anastomosis between the pouch and the anal canal and (2) mucosectomy with a hand-sewn ileoanal anastomosis at the dentate line. Although this procedure is thought to abolish the risk of colorectal adenoma, an increasing number of case reports have been published concerning the development of adenoma at the anastomotic site. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall cumulative risk of developing adenomatous polyps after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and to compare the cumulative risk after either anastomotic technique. A total of 126 consecutive FAP patients undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy were identified from polyposis registries in The Netherlands, Denmark, Italy, Germany, and New York. Life-table analysis was used to calculate the cumulative risk of developing polyps in 97 patients with at least 1 year of endoscopic follow-up (median 66 months, range 12 to 188 months). A double-stapled anastomosis was used in 35 patients, whereas in 62 patients a hand-sewn anastomosis with a mucosectomy was performed. In 13 patients polyps developed at the anastomotic site, four with severe and four with moderate dysplasia. None of the patients developed a carcinoma at the anastomotic site. The cumulative risk of developing a polyp at the anastomotic site was 8% (95% confidence interval 2% to 14%) at 3.5 years and 18% (95% confidence interval 8% to 28%) at 7 years, respectively. The risk of developing a polyp at the anastomotic site within 7 years was 31% for patients with a double-stapled vs. 10% for patients with a hand-sewn anastomosis with mucosectomy (P = 0.03 [log-rank test]). Because FAP patients undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy with either a double-stapled or hand-sewn anastomosis have a substantial risk of developing adenomatous polyps at the anastomotic site, lifelong endoscopic surveillance is mandatory in both groups.
越来越多的家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)患者接受了保留直肠结肠切除术并进行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术。目前有两种技术用于构建回肠贮袋肛管吻合术:(1)贮袋与肛管之间的双吻合器吻合术;(2)在齿状线处进行黏膜切除并手工缝合回肠肛管吻合术。尽管该手术被认为可消除结直肠腺瘤的风险,但关于吻合口部位腺瘤发生的病例报告越来越多。本研究的目的是评估回肠贮袋肛管吻合术后发生腺瘤性息肉的总体累积风险,并比较两种吻合技术后的累积风险。从荷兰、丹麦、意大利、德国和纽约的息肉病登记处共识别出126例连续接受保留直肠结肠切除术的FAP患者。采用生命表分析计算97例至少有1年内镜随访(中位时间66个月,范围12至188个月)患者发生息肉的累积风险。35例患者采用双吻合器吻合术,62例患者进行了黏膜切除并手工缝合吻合术。13例患者在吻合口部位出现息肉,4例为重度发育异常,4例为中度发育异常。所有患者在吻合口部位均未发生癌。吻合口部位发生息肉的累积风险在3.5年时为8%(95%置信区间2%至14%),在7年时为18%(95%置信区间8%至28%)。双吻合器吻合术患者在7年内吻合口部位发生息肉的风险为31%,而黏膜切除并手工缝合吻合术患者为10%(P = 0.03 [对数秩检验])。由于接受双吻合器或手工缝合吻合术的保留直肠结肠切除术的FAP患者在吻合口部位发生腺瘤性息肉的风险较高,因此两组患者均需终身进行内镜监测。