Suppr超能文献

[植入起搏器患者的神经心源性晕厥]

[Neurocardiogenic syncopes in patients with implanted pacemakers].

作者信息

Keim M W, Momper R, Heck K F, Braun B, Hust M H

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik, Kreiskrankenhaus Reutlingen Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus, Universität Tübingen.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999 Aug 20;124(33):953-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024457.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Recently the tilting table test (tilting up to 70 degrees angle) has established itself for the diagnosis of neurocardiogenic syncope (NS). Usually patients with bradycardic arrhythmias or asystole are treated by pacemaker implantation. But if the syncope is of neurocardiogenic aetiology other therapeutic alternatives must be chosen. We here report on seven patients in whom a pacemaker had been implanted in the treatment of syncopes, in ignorance of their neurocardiogenic aetiology, yet they had recurred.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pacemakers had been implanted in eight patients: two with sick sinus syndrome, three with sinus bradycardia, one with brady-tachyarrhythmia, one with asystole and one with Mobitz-type 2 degrees AV block. All patients continued to have syncopes, when sitting or standing, months to years after the pacemaker implantation. The tilting table test (up to 30 min at an angle of 70 degrees) was positive in all patients. There was no case of pacemaker malfunction.

RESULTS

One patient declined further treatment. The remaining seven patients were symptom-free in the tilting table test on various medications: theophylline up to 2 x 350 mg, metoprolol up to 2 x 100 mg or disopyramide 3 x 100 mg.

CONCLUSION

Patients with syncope while sitting or standing should undergo the tilting table test to determine whether the cause is neurocardiogenic so that pacemaker implantation can be avoided. The majority of patients with NS can be successfully treated by drugs. But in some patients pacemaker implantation may have to considered if drug treatment has failed.

摘要

背景与目的

近来,倾斜试验(倾斜至70度角)已成为诊断神经心源性晕厥(NS)的常用方法。通常,缓慢性心律失常或心脏停搏的患者通过植入起搏器进行治疗。但如果晕厥是由神经心源性病因引起的,则必须选择其他治疗方法。我们在此报告7例患者,他们因不明神经心源性病因在晕厥治疗中植入了起搏器,但晕厥仍复发。

患者与方法

8例患者植入了起搏器:2例患有病态窦房结综合征,3例窦性心动过缓,1例缓慢性快速性心律失常,1例心脏停搏,1例莫氏Ⅱ型房室传导阻滞。所有患者在植入起搏器数月至数年后,坐立或站立时仍会晕厥。所有患者倾斜试验(70度角,持续30分钟)均呈阳性。无起搏器故障病例。

结果

1例患者拒绝进一步治疗。其余7例患者在服用各种药物后倾斜试验无症状:氨茶碱最高达2×350毫克,美托洛尔最高达2×100毫克或丙吡胺3×100毫克。

结论

坐立或站立时晕厥的患者应进行倾斜试验,以确定病因是否为神经心源性,从而避免植入起搏器。大多数NS患者可通过药物成功治疗。但在某些患者中,如果药物治疗失败,可能不得不考虑植入起搏器。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验