Palmieri V, Bella J N, DeQuattro V, Roman M J, Hahn R T, Dahlof B, Sharpe N, Lau C P, Chen W C, Paran E, de Simone G, Devereux R B
Department of Medicine, The New York Presbyterian Hospital-Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York 10021, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Sep 1;84(5):558-62. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00377-x.
Abnormalities of left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling and stress-corrected midwall shortening (MWS) have been described in hypertensive patients with normal ejection fraction (EF). However, whether stress-corrected MWS parallels LV diastolic filling better than EF does remains uncertain. Blood pressure, body mass index, echocardiographic LV mass and LV geometry, EF and stress-corrected MWS, LV diastolic filling (peak E- and A-wave velocities, E-wave deceleration time, and atrial filling fraction) were evaluated in 212 hypertensive patients with LV hypertrophy enrolled in the Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement study. LV structure, geometry, as well as LV diastolic filling, were compared between patients with reduced EF (<55%, n = 39, 18%) and those with normal EF (>55%) as well as between patients with reduced stress-corrected MWS (<89.2%, n = 31, 15%) and those with normal stress-corrected MWS (>89.2%). Patients with reduced EF had higher LV mass, eccentric LV geometry, and higher heart rate than those with normal EF, although they did not differ in age, blood pressure, or body mass index. LV filling pattern was also similar in those 2 groups. Patients with reduced stress-corrected MWS had higher atrial filling fraction, body mass index, heart rate, LV mass, and concentric geometry than those with normal stress-corrected MWS. Atrial filling fraction was negatively associated with stress-corrected MWS, but not with EF in multivariate models, independently of age, gender, heart rate, and body mass index. Thus, in hypertensive patients with LV hypertrophy, abnormal LV diastolic filling is more closely related to impaired myocardial contractility than to LV chamber EF.
射血分数(EF)正常的高血压患者存在左心室(LV)舒张期充盈异常和应力校正的室壁中层缩短(MWS)。然而,应力校正的MWS是否比EF能更好地反映LV舒张期充盈情况仍不确定。在参与前瞻性随机依那普利研究评估心室扩大逆转研究的212例LV肥厚的高血压患者中,评估了血压、体重指数、超声心动图测量的LV质量和LV几何形态、EF和应力校正的MWS、LV舒张期充盈(E波和A波峰值速度、E波减速时间和心房充盈分数)。比较了EF降低(<55%,n = 39,18%)和EF正常(>55%)的患者以及应力校正的MWS降低(<89.2%,n = 31,15%)和应力校正的MWS正常(>89.2%)的患者之间的LV结构、几何形态以及LV舒张期充盈情况。EF降低的患者比EF正常的患者有更高的LV质量、偏心的LV几何形态和更高的心率,尽管他们在年龄、血压或体重指数方面没有差异。这两组患者的LV充盈模式也相似。应力校正的MWS降低的患者比应力校正的MWS正常的患者有更高的心房充盈分数、体重指数、心率、LV质量和向心性几何形态。在多变量模型中,心房充盈分数与应力校正的MWS呈负相关,但与EF无关,且独立于年龄、性别、心率和体重指数。因此,在LV肥厚的高血压患者中,异常的LV舒张期充盈与心肌收缩力受损的关系比与LV腔EF的关系更密切。