Luks F I, Logan J, Breuer C K, Kurkchubasche A G, Wesselhoeft C W, Tracy T F
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02905, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Sep;153(9):965-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.9.965.
Laparoscopy may offer fast recovery and improved cosmesis, but its cost has been perceived as excessive.
To analyze the total hospital costs of laparoscopy vs open surgery.
Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis evaluating all cases performed in a 36-month period (September 1995 to August 1998). Cases were evaluated for operative time, itemized cost of supplies, and length of hospitalization.
Operations performed by pediatric surgeons in a tertiary care children's hospital.
Consecutive children undergoing laparoscopic or open appendectomies, cholecystectomies, fundoplications, and splenectomies. Patients were not randomized to laparoscopy, or open surgery.
Laparoscopic procedures performed with a core set of reusable equipment and a limited number of disposable instruments.
Cost surplus of laparoscopy was evaluated, and compared with savings associated with decreased hospital stay, to obtain cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy per procedure.
There were 26 laparoscopic and 359 open appendectomies; 33 laparoscopic and 3 open cholecystectomies; 16 laparoscopic and 18 open fundoplications; and 16 laparoscopic and 7 open splenectomies. Excess operating costs per procedure were $442.00 for appendectomy, $634.60 for fundoplication, $847.50 for cholecystectomy, and $1551.30 for splenectomy. Hospital stay was decreased for all laparoscopies, resulting in an overall savings per laparoscopic procedure of $2369.90 for appendectomy, $5390.90 for fundoplication, $1161.00 for cholecystectomy, and $858.90 for splenectomy.
Laparoscopy is cost-effective, particularly for fundoplication, appendectomy, and cholecystectomy. Detailing the costs of supplies, operating time, and length of stay allows interinstitutional comparison and critical cost-analysis of laparoscopy. With a more selective use of reusable instruments and further shortening of operative time, the global savings of laparoscopy may increase.
腹腔镜检查可能带来快速康复和更好的美容效果,但人们认为其成本过高。
分析腹腔镜检查与开放手术的总住院费用。
回顾性成本效益分析,评估在36个月期间(1995年9月至1998年8月)进行的所有病例。对病例的手术时间、用品逐项成本和住院时间进行评估。
三级护理儿童医院的小儿外科医生进行的手术。
连续接受腹腔镜或开放阑尾切除术、胆囊切除术、胃底折叠术和脾切除术的儿童。患者未随机分配至腹腔镜检查或开放手术。
使用一套核心的可重复使用设备和有限数量的一次性器械进行腹腔镜手术。
评估腹腔镜检查的成本盈余,并与因住院时间缩短而节省的费用进行比较,以获得每次手术腹腔镜检查的成本效益。
有26例腹腔镜阑尾切除术和359例开放阑尾切除术;33例腹腔镜胆囊切除术和3例开放胆囊切除术;16例腹腔镜胃底折叠术和18例开放胃底折叠术;16例腹腔镜脾切除术和7例开放脾切除术。阑尾切除术每次手术的额外手术成本为442.00美元,胃底折叠术为634.60美元,胆囊切除术为847.50美元,脾切除术为1551.30美元。所有腹腔镜手术的住院时间均缩短,阑尾切除术每次腹腔镜手术总体节省2369.90美元,胃底折叠术节省5390.90美元,胆囊切除术节省1161.00美元;脾切除术节省858.90美元。
腹腔镜检查具有成本效益,特别是对于胃底折叠术、阑尾切除术和胆囊切除术。详细列出用品成本、手术时间和住院时间,有助于进行机构间比较和对腹腔镜检查进行关键的成本分析。更有选择性地使用可重复使用器械并进一步缩短手术时间,腹腔镜检查的总体节省可能会增加。