Tola J C, Holtzman R, Lottenberg L
Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Memorial Regional Hospital, Hollywood, Florida 33021, USA.
Am Surg. 1999 Sep;65(9):833-7; discussion 837-8.
The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and complications of bedside placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters in the intensive care unit (ICU) in the trauma patient. A prospective trial involving 25 trauma patients admitted to Memorial Regional Hospital (Hollywood, Florida), a Level I trauma center, from April 1997 to April 1998, meeting the criteria for insertion of a prophylactic IVC filter according to Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma trauma practice guidelines was conducted. IVC filters were placed in the ICU with the use of a digital C-arm (Siemens) and strict adherence to sterile technique. Renal vein anatomy and size of the IVC were documented for every case. Charges for equipment and supplies were analyzed and compared with those placed in the radiology suite and the operating room. Of 810 patients admitted as trauma alerts during the study period, 25 had an IVC filter placed at the bedside in the ICU. The indications for filter placement included a contraindication to anticoagulation and one of the following: severe pelvic fracture and/or associated long-bone fracture (32%); bilateral lower extremity fractures (28%); spinal cord injury with para- or quadriplegia (16%); femoral vein thrombosis (16%); and severe brain injury (8%). There were no intraoperative nor postoperative complications; overall mortality was 20 per cent, unrelated to the IVC filter placement. Average time for insertion was 47 minutes for the series and 20 minutes for the last five cases. Savings of $1844 or $2245 per filter are obtained when IVC filters are placed in the ICU when compared with the operating room or radiology suite, respectively. Bedside placement of IVC filters in the ICU is a safe, cost-effective method that can be performed without compromising the patient and avoids the potential disasters involved in transporting critically ill patients.
本研究的目的是确定在创伤患者的重症监护病房(ICU)床旁放置下腔静脉(IVC)滤器的可行性、成本效益及并发症情况。1997年4月至1998年4月,在一级创伤中心纪念地区医院(佛罗里达州好莱坞)进行了一项前瞻性试验,纳入了25例创伤患者,这些患者符合根据东部创伤外科学会创伤实践指南插入预防性IVC滤器的标准。使用数字C型臂(西门子)并严格遵守无菌技术在ICU放置IVC滤器。记录每例患者的肾静脉解剖结构和IVC大小。分析设备和耗材费用,并与在放射科和手术室放置滤器的费用进行比较。在研究期间作为创伤警报入院的810例患者中,有25例在ICU床旁放置了IVC滤器。放置滤器的指征包括抗凝禁忌以及以下情况之一:严重骨盆骨折和/或相关长骨骨折(32%);双侧下肢骨折(28%);伴有截瘫或四肢瘫的脊髓损伤(16%);股静脉血栓形成(16%);以及严重脑损伤(8%)。术中及术后均无并发症;总体死亡率为20%,与IVC滤器放置无关。该系列平均插入时间为47分钟,最后5例平均为20分钟。与手术室或放射科相比,在ICU放置IVC滤器时,每个滤器分别节省1844美元或2245美元。在ICU床旁放置IVC滤器是一种安全、具有成本效益的方法,可在不影响患者的情况下进行,且避免了转运重症患者时可能发生的灾难。