Rosenthal David, Wellons Eric D, Levitt Adam B, Shuler Frederick W, O'Conner Robert E, Henderson Vernon J
Department of Vascular Surgery, Atlanta Medial Center, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Nov;40(5):958-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.07.048.
Patients with multiple trauma often have injuries that preclude the use of anticoagulation therapy or sequential compression device prophylaxis. Temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filters (IVCFs) offer protection against pulmonary embolism during the early immediate injury and perioperative period, when risk is highest, while averting potential long-term sequelae of permanent IVCFs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic, temporary IVCF placement at the intensive care unit bedside under real-time intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in patients with multiple trauma.
Ninety-four patients with multiple trauma seen between July 1, 2002, and November 1, 2003, underwent placement of OptEase (Cordis Endovascular) retrievable IVCFs under real-time IVUS guidance. Mean (+/-SD) Injury Severity Score was 25.1 +/- 2.2). Abdominal x-ray films were obtained in all patients to verify filter location. Before IVCF retrieval all patients underwent femoral vein color-flow ultrasound scanning to rule out deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pre-procedure and post-procedure vena cavography to identify possible IVCF thrombus entrapment and post-retrieval inferior vena cava injury.
Nineteen patients died of their injuries; no deaths were related to IVCF placement. One pulmonary embolism occurred during follow-up after filter retrieval, and 1 insertion site femoral vein DVT occurred. As verified on abdominal x-ray films, 96.8% (91 of 94) of IVCFs were placed without complications at the L2-3 level. Filter-related complications included 2 groin hematomas (2.1%) and 3 IVCFs misplaced in the right iliac vein (3.2%), early in our experience; the filters were uneventfully retrieved and replaced in the inferior vena cava within 24 hours. Thirty-one patients underwent uneventful retrieval of IVCFs after DVT or pulmonary embolism anticoagulation prophylaxis was initiated. Forty-four filters were not removed, 41 because severity of injury prevented DVT or pulmonary embolism prophylaxis and 3 because of thrombus trapped within the filter.
Prophylactic, temporary IVCF placement at the intensive care unit bedside under IVUS guidance in patients with multiple trauma is simple and safe, and serves as an effective "bridge" to anticoagulation therapy until venous thromboembolism prophylaxis can be initiated. Further investigation of this bedside technique and the role of temporary IVCFs in patients with multiple trauma is warranted.
Patients with multiple trauma often have injuries that preclude the use of anticoagulation therapy or sequential compression device prophylaxis. Temporary inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) offer protection against pulmonary embolism during the perioperative and immediate injury period, when risk is highest. Ninety-four patients with multiple trauma underwent prophylactic, temporary IVCF placement at the intensive care unit bedside under real-time intravascular ultrasound. One pulmonary embolism occurred during follow-up after filter retrieval, and 1 insertion site femoral vein deep venous thrombosis occurred. Ninety-one of 94 IVCFs (96.8%) were placed without complication. Thirty-one patients underwent uneventful retrieval of IVCFs after anticoagulation prophylaxis was initiated. Forty-four filters were not removed, because of severity of injury (n = 41) or because of trapped thrombus within the filter (n = 3). Prophylactic, temporary IVCFs placed under intravascular ultrasound guidance at the bedside in patients with multiple trauma is simple, safe, and an effective bridge to anticoagulation therapy.
多发伤患者常有一些损伤,使得抗凝治疗或序贯加压装置预防措施无法使用。临时性下腔静脉(IVC)滤器(IVCFs)可在损伤早期和围手术期(风险最高时)预防肺栓塞,同时避免永久性IVCFs可能带来的长期后遗症。本研究的目的是评估在实时血管内超声(IVUS)引导下,于重症监护病房床边预防性置入临时性IVCFs对多发伤患者的疗效。
2002年7月1日至2003年11月1日期间收治的94例多发伤患者,在实时IVUS引导下置入OptEase(Cordis Endovascular)可回收IVCFs。平均(±标准差)损伤严重度评分为25.1±2.2。所有患者均行腹部X线片检查以核实滤器位置。在取出IVCF之前,所有患者均接受股静脉彩色血流超声扫描以排除深静脉血栓形成(DVT),并在操作前和操作后行腔静脉造影,以确定IVCF是否有血栓嵌顿及取出后下腔静脉损伤情况。
19例患者因伤死亡;无死亡与IVCF置入相关。在滤器取出后的随访期间发生1例肺栓塞,1例出现置入部位股静脉DVT。经腹部X线片证实,96.8%(9of94)的IVCFs在L2 - 3水平置入且无并发症。滤器相关并发症包括2例腹股沟血肿(2.1%)和3例IVCFs误置于右髂静脉(3.2%),这是我们早期的经验;这些滤器在24小时内顺利取出并重新置入下腔静脉。31例患者在开始进行DVT或肺栓塞抗凝预防后顺利取出IVCFs。44个滤器未取出,41个是因为损伤严重程度妨碍了DVT或肺栓塞预防,3个是因为滤器内有血栓嵌顿。
在IVUS引导下于重症监护病房床边对多发伤患者预防性置入临时性IVCFs简单且安全,可作为抗凝治疗的有效“桥梁”,直至能够开始进行静脉血栓栓塞预防。有必要对这种床边技术以及临时性IVCFs在多发伤患者中的作用进行进一步研究。
多发伤患者常有一些损伤使得抗凝治疗或序贯加压装置预防措施无法使用。临时性下腔静脉滤器(IVCFs)在围手术期和损伤早期(风险最高时)可预防肺栓塞。94例多发伤患者在实时血管内超声引导下于重症监护病房床边接受预防性临时性IVCF置入。在滤器取出后的随访期间发生1例肺栓塞,1例出现置入部位股静脉深静脉血栓形成。94个IVCFs中有91个(96.8%)置入无并发症。31例患者在开始抗凝预防后顺利取出IVCFs。44个滤器未取出,原因是损伤严重(41例)或滤器内有血栓嵌顿(3例)。在血管内超声引导下于床边对多发伤患者预防性置入临时性IVCFs简单、安全,是抗凝治疗的有效桥梁。