Kronenberg F, Kronenberg M F, Kiechl S, Trenkwalder E, Santer P, Oberhollenzer F, Egger G, Utermann G, Willeit J
Institute of Medical Biology and Human Genetics, University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Circulation. 1999 Sep 14;100(11):1154-60. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.11.1154.
Experimental studies have suggested both atherogenic and thrombogenic properties of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], depending on Lp(a) plasma concentrations and varying antifibrinolytic capacity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms. Epidemiological studies may contribute to assessment of the relevance of these findings in the general population.
This study prospectively investigated the association between Lp(a) plasma concentrations, apo(a) phenotypes, and the 5-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis assessed by high-resolution duplex ultrasound in a random sample population of 826 individuals. We differentiated early atherogenesis (incident nonstenotic atherosclerosis) from advanced (stenotic) stages in atherosclerosis that originate mainly from atherothrombotic mechanisms. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis in a dose-dependent fashion, with this association being confined to subjects with LDL cholesterol levels above the population median (3.3 mmol/L). Apo(a) phenotypes were distributed similarly in subjects with and without early carotid atherosclerosis. In contrast, apo(a) phenotypes of low molecular weight emerged as one of the strongest risk predictors of advanced stenotic atherosclerosis, especially when associated with high Lp(a) plasma concentrations (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.8 to 14. 9).
Lp(a) is one of the few risk factors capable of promoting both early and advanced stages of atherogenesis. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis synergistically with high LDL cholesterol. Low-molecular-weight apo(a) phenotypes with a putatively high antifibrinolytic capacity in turn emerged as one of the leading risk conditions of advanced stenotic stages of atherosclerosis.
实验研究表明,脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]具有致动脉粥样硬化和致血栓形成的特性,这取决于Lp(a)的血浆浓度以及载脂蛋白(a)[apo(a)]异构体不同的抗纤溶能力。流行病学研究可能有助于评估这些发现对一般人群的相关性。
本研究前瞻性调查了826名随机抽样人群中Lp(a)血浆浓度、apo(a)表型与通过高分辨率双功超声评估的颈动脉粥样硬化5年进展之间的关联。我们将早期动脉粥样硬化(新发非狭窄性动脉粥样硬化)与主要源于动脉粥样硬化血栓形成机制的动脉粥样硬化晚期(狭窄性)阶段区分开来。Lp(a)血浆浓度以剂量依赖方式预测早期动脉粥样硬化风险,这种关联仅限于低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平高于人群中位数(3.3 mmol/L)的受试者。有和没有早期颈动脉粥样硬化的受试者中apo(a)表型分布相似。相比之下,低分子量的apo(a)表型成为晚期狭窄性动脉粥样硬化最强的风险预测因素之一,尤其是与高Lp(a)血浆浓度相关时(优势比为6.4;95%可信区间为2.8至14.9)。
Lp(a)是少数能够促进动脉粥样硬化早期和晚期阶段的危险因素之一。Lp(a)血浆浓度与高LDL胆固醇协同预测早期动脉粥样硬化风险。具有假定高抗纤溶能力的低分子量apo(a)表型反过来成为动脉粥样硬化晚期狭窄阶段的主要风险状况之一。