Williamson J W, McColl R, Mathews D, Ginsburg M, Mitchell J H
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-8876, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 Sep;87(3):1213-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1999.87.3.1213.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether there were differences in the magnitude of insular cortex activation across varying intensities of static and dynamic exercise. Eighteen healthy volunteers were studied: eight during two intensities of leg cycling and ten at different time periods during sustained static handgrip at 25% maximal voluntary contraction or postexercise cuff occlusion. Heart rate, blood pressure (BP), perceived exertion, and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) distribution data were collected. There were significantly greater increases in insular rCBF during lower (6.3 +/- 1.7%; P < 0.05) and higher (13.3 +/- 3.8%; P < 0.05) intensity cycling and across time during static handgrip (change from rest for right insula at 2-3 min, 3.8 +/- 1.1%, P < 0.05; and at 4-5 min, 8.6 +/- 2.8%, P < 0.05). Insular rCBF was decreased during postexercise cuff occlusion (-5.5 +/- 1.2%; P < 0.05) with BP sustained at exercise levels. Right insular rCBF data, but not left, were significantly related, with individual BP changes (r(2) = 0.80; P < 0.001) and with ratings of perceived exertion (r(2) = 0.79; P < 0.01) during exercise. These results suggest that the magnitude of insular activation varies with the intensity of exercise, which may be further related to the level of perceived effort or central command.
本研究的目的是确定在不同强度的静态和动态运动中,岛叶皮质激活程度是否存在差异。对18名健康志愿者进行了研究:8人在两种强度的腿部骑行过程中接受研究,10人在持续静态手握力为最大自主收缩的25%时的不同时间段或运动后袖带闭塞时接受研究。收集了心率、血压(BP)、主观用力感觉和局部脑血流(rCBF)分布数据。在较低强度(6.3±1.7%;P<0.05)和较高强度(13.3±3.8%;P<0.05)的骑行过程中,以及在静态手握力过程中随时间推移,岛叶rCBF均有显著更大幅度的增加(右侧岛叶在2 - 3分钟时相对于静息状态变化3.8±1.1%,P<0.05;在4 - 5分钟时变化8.6±2.8%,P<0.05)。在运动后袖带闭塞期间,岛叶rCBF下降(-5.5±1.2%;P<0.05),而血压维持在运动水平。右侧岛叶rCBF数据而非左侧数据与运动期间个体血压变化(r² = 0.80;P<0.001)以及主观用力感觉评分(r² = 0.79;P<0.01)显著相关。这些结果表明,岛叶激活程度随运动强度而变化,这可能进一步与主观努力程度或中枢指令水平相关。