Suppr超能文献

兰索拉唑与奥美拉唑治疗十二指肠溃疡愈合及预防复发的比较:一项随机、多中心、双盲试验

Lansoprazole versus omeprazole for duodenal ulcer healing and prevention of relapse: a randomized, multicenter, double-masked trial.

作者信息

Dobrilla G, Piazzi L, Fiocca R

机构信息

Divisione di Gastroenterologia e Servizio di Fisiopatologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva Ospedale Generale Regionale, Bolzano, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1999 Aug;21(8):1321-32. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(99)80033-2.

Abstract

The aim of this randomized, multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group study was to compare the efficacy of lansoprazole with that of omeprazole monotherapy in duodenal ulcer healing and prevention of relapse. A total of 251 patients with duodenal ulcer were treated with either lansoprazole 30 mg/d (n = 167) or omeprazole 40 mg/d (n = 84). Patients with healed ulcers were then randomly allocated to 12 months of maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 15 mg/d (n = 74), lansoprazole 30 mg/d (n = 71), or omeprazole 20 mg/d (n = 73). Healing rates at 4 weeks (intent-to-treat analysis) were 93.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.2% to 97.6%) with lansoprazole and 97.5% (95% CI, 93.7% to 100%) with omeprazole; there were no significant differences between groups. Endoscopic relapse rates after 6 months were 4.5% (95% CI, 0% to 10.6%) with lansoprazole 15 mg, 0% with lansoprazole 30 mg, and 6.3% (95% CI, 1.5% to 12.5%) with omeprazole 20 mg, compared with 3.3% (95% CI, 0% to 8.2%), 0%, and 3.5% (95% CI, 0% to 8.8%), respectively, at 12 months. Again, there were no significant differences between groups. The incidence of adverse events during acute treatment was 6.0% and 7.1% in the lansoprazole and omeprazole groups, respectively; during maintenance therapy, the incidences were 12.2% (lansoprazole 15 mg), 5.6% (lansoprazole 30 mg), and 11.0% (omeprazole 20 mg). Within treatment groups, pain was significantly ameliorated after the acute phase but not after maintenance therapy (P < 0.05); no differences were observed between groups. Gastrin values increased significantly after acute therapy (P < 0.05), persisted at these increased levels during maintenance therapy, and returned to normal after 6-month follow-up. Both lansoprazole and omeprazole were highly effective and well tolerated in the treatment of duodenal ulcer; relapse rates were similar for all doses studied. Thus no additional benefit is to be gained from using a proton-pump inhibitor at a dose > 15 mg lansoprazole to prevent relapse.

摘要

这项随机、多中心、双盲、平行组研究的目的是比较兰索拉唑与奥美拉唑单药治疗十二指肠溃疡愈合及预防复发的疗效。共有251例十二指肠溃疡患者接受兰索拉唑30mg/d(n = 167)或奥美拉唑40mg/d(n = 84)治疗。溃疡愈合的患者随后被随机分配接受12个月的维持治疗,分别为兰索拉唑15mg/d(n = 74)、兰索拉唑30mg/d(n = 71)或奥美拉唑20mg/d(n = 73)。4周时的愈合率(意向性分析),兰索拉唑组为93.9%(95%置信区间[CI],90.2%至97.6%),奥美拉唑组为97.5%(95%CI,93.7%至100%);两组间无显著差异。6个月后的内镜复发率,兰索拉唑15mg组为4.5%(95%CI,0%至10.6%),兰索拉唑30mg组为0%,奥美拉唑20mg组为6.3%(95%CI,1.5%至12.5%),而12个月时分别为3.3%(95%CI,0%至8.2%)、0%和3.5%(95%CI,0%至8.8%)。同样,两组间无显著差异。急性治疗期间,兰索拉唑组和奥美拉唑组不良事件发生率分别为6.0%和7.1%;维持治疗期间,发生率分别为12.2%(兰索拉唑15mg)、5.6%(兰索拉唑30mg)和11.0%(奥美拉唑20mg)。在各治疗组内,急性期后疼痛显著改善,但维持治疗后未改善(P < 0.05);组间未观察到差异。急性治疗后胃泌素值显著升高(P < 0.05),维持治疗期间维持在升高水平,6个月随访后恢复正常。兰索拉唑和奥美拉唑治疗十二指肠溃疡均高效且耐受性良好;所有研究剂量的复发率相似。因此,使用剂量>15mg兰索拉唑的质子泵抑制剂预防复发并无额外益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验