Lloyd-Jones D M, Evans J C, Larson M G, O'Donnell C J, Levy D
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study, National Institutes of Health, MA 01702, USA.
Hypertension. 1999 Sep;34(3):381-5. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.34.3.381.
The sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure classifies blood pressure into stages on the basis of both systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure levels. When a disparity exists between SBP and DBP stages, patients are classified into the higher stage ("up-staged"). We evaluated the effect of disparate levels of SBP and DBP on blood pressure staging and eligibility for therapy. We examined 4962 Framingham Heart Study subjects between 1990 and 1995 and determined blood pressure stages on the basis of SBP alone, DBP alone, or both. After the exclusion of subjects on antihypertensive therapy (n=1306), 3656 subjects (mean age 58+/-13 years; 55% women) were eligible. In this sample, 64.6% of subjects had congruent stages of SBP and DBP, 31.6% were up-staged on the basis of SBP, and 3.8% on the basis of DBP; thus, SBP alone correctly classified JNC-VI stage in approximately 96% (64.6%+31.6%) of the subjects. Among subjects >60 years of age, SBP alone correctly classified 99% of subjects; in those </=60 years old, SBP alone correctly classified 95%. Of 1488 subjects with high-normal blood pressure or hypertension, who were potentially eligible for drug therapy, 13.0% had congruent elevations of SBP and DBP, 77.7% were up-staged on the basis of SBP, and 9.3% were up-staged on the basis of DBP; SBP alone correctly classified 91%, whereas DBP alone correctly classified only 22%. SBP elevation out of proportion to DBP is common in middle-aged and older persons. SBP appears to play a greater role in the determination of JNC-VI blood pressure stage and eligibility for therapy. Given these results, combined with evidence from hypertension treatment trials, future guidelines might consider a greater role for SBP than for DBP in determining the presence of hypertension, risk of cardiovascular events, eligibility for therapy, and benefits of treatment.
美国国家高血压预防、检测、评估与治疗联合委员会第六次报告根据收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)水平对血压进行分期。当SBP和DBP分期存在差异时,患者被归入较高分期(“上调分期”)。我们评估了SBP和DBP水平不一致对血压分期及治疗资格的影响。我们研究了1990年至1995年间4962名弗雷明汉心脏研究受试者,并根据单独的SBP、单独的DBP或两者来确定血压分期。在排除接受抗高血压治疗的受试者(n = 1306)后,3656名受试者(平均年龄58±13岁;55%为女性)符合条件。在这个样本中,64.6%的受试者SBP和DBP分期一致,31.6%根据SBP上调分期,3.8%根据DBP上调分期;因此,单独SBP能正确分类约96%(64.6% + 31.6%)受试者的JNC - VI分期。在60岁以上的受试者中,单独SBP能正确分类99%的受试者;在60岁及以下的受试者中,单独SBP能正确分类95%。在1488名血压正常高值或高血压且可能符合药物治疗条件的受试者中,13.0%的受试者SBP和DBP均升高,77.7%根据SBP上调分期,9.3%根据DBP上调分期;单独SBP能正确分类91%,而单独DBP只能正确分类22%。SBP升高与DBP不成比例在中老年人中很常见。SBP在确定JNC - VI血压分期及治疗资格方面似乎发挥着更大作用。鉴于这些结果,结合高血压治疗试验的证据,未来指南在确定高血压的存在、心血管事件风险、治疗资格及治疗益处时,可能会考虑SBP比DBP发挥更大作用。