Suppr超能文献

基于美国国家联合委员会第六次报告(JNC-VI),收缩压对于伊朗成年人群血压分类及高血压判定是否足够?德黑兰血脂与血糖研究(TLGS)。

Is systolic blood pressure sufficient for classification of blood pressure and determination of hypertension based on JNC-VI in an Iranian adult population? Tehran lipid and glucose study (TLGS).

作者信息

Azizi F, Rashidi A, Ghanbarian A, Madjid M

机构信息

Endocrine Research Center, Shahid Beheshty University of Medical Sciences, IR, Iran.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):287-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001539.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if systolic blood pressure (SBP) by itself is sufficient for the JNC-VI (Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure)-based classification of blood pressure of Tehranian adult population. Clinically, SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are sometimes at different stages in the same individual and the higher stage is considered to classify blood pressure level. The prevalence of disparate levels of SBP and DBP has only recently been noticed. Some researches have reported the importance of SBP level, and not DBP, in determining the appropriate classification of hypertension even in those undergoing treatment. Data were collected for 3823 men and 5159 women aged 20-69 years who were not using antihypertensive medication, in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS), a cross-sectional phase of a large epidemiological study first established in 1999. The study used the mean of two separate blood pressure measurements in each individual. High blood pressure is defined according to the highest level of SBP or DBP. In 86.3% of the subjects, blood pressure stage was determined according to SBP and in 90.0% of them according to DBP. In 77.4% of the subjects (75.7% of men and 78.7% of women), SBP determined blood pressure in the same stage as DBP did. The role of SBP was the most prominent in age groups 20-29 and 60-69 years (91.4 and 90.8%, respectively) and the least in age group 40-49 years (80.4% of the subjects). DBP had a more prominent role in younger ages and the least significance in older ages. In conclusion, SBP has a more prominent role than DBP in determining blood pressure stage according to JNC-VI only in the 60-69-year-old group. The role of DBP is more prominent in other age groups.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定收缩压(SBP)本身是否足以用于基于美国国家联合委员会高血压检测、评估与治疗第六次报告(JNC-VI)对德黑兰成年人群进行血压分类。临床上,收缩压和舒张压(DBP)在同一个体中有时处于不同阶段,较高阶段被视为血压水平的分类依据。收缩压和舒张压水平不一致的情况直到最近才被注意到。一些研究报告了收缩压水平而非舒张压水平在确定高血压的适当分类中的重要性,即使在接受治疗的人群中也是如此。在德黑兰血脂与血糖研究(TLGS)中收集了3823名年龄在20 - 69岁且未使用抗高血压药物的男性和5159名女性的数据,该研究是一项始于1999年的大型流行病学研究的横断面阶段。该研究采用了每个个体两次独立血压测量的平均值。高血压根据收缩压或舒张压的最高水平来定义。在86.3%的受试者中,血压阶段根据收缩压确定,在其中90.0%的受试者中根据舒张压确定。在77.4%的受试者(75.7%的男性和78.7%的女性)中,收缩压确定的血压阶段与舒张压相同。收缩压的作用在20 - 29岁和60 - 69岁年龄组中最为突出(分别为91.4%和90.8%),在40 - 49岁年龄组中最不明显(80.4%的受试者)。舒张压在较年轻年龄组中作用更突出,在较年长年龄组中意义最小。总之,仅在60 - 69岁年龄组中,根据JNC-VI,收缩压在确定血压阶段方面比舒张压作用更突出。舒张压在其他年龄组中作用更突出。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验