Suppr超能文献

突触可塑性与学习和记忆:长时程增强及其他。

Synaptic plasticity and learning and memory: LTP and beyond.

作者信息

Hölscher C

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University College Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Neurosci Res. 1999 Oct 1;58(1):62-75.

Abstract

Long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic activity is by far the most popular and widely researched model of synaptic plastic changes that might occur during learning. Numerous recent reports, however, have not found a correlation between the inducibility of LTP in the hippocampus and the ability of animals to learn hippocampus-dependent tasks. For example, some experiments with gene deletion (knockout) mice strains have shown that in some strains LTP is not inducible in the dentate gyrus, in area CA3, or CA1, but the animals are still able to learn spatial tasks. This apparent mismatch has rejuvenated the discussion concerning whether LTP is a good model for mechanisms that underlie memory formation in the nervous system. This review analyzes the conditions under which LTP is induced or learning takes place and suggests reasons for the mismatches that can occur and what we can learn from them. High-frequency stimulation protocols and in vitro assays cannot be seen to resemble natural firing patterns or conditions found in the brain. More physiological experimental conditions, especially in vivo recording in awake animals, could lead the way to the development of improved models of learning mechanisms that better correlate with learning abilities of animals.

摘要

突触活动的长期增强(LTP)是目前最流行且研究最广泛的突触可塑性变化模型,这种变化可能在学习过程中发生。然而,最近大量报告并未发现海马体中LTP的诱导能力与动物学习依赖海马体任务的能力之间存在相关性。例如,一些针对基因敲除小鼠品系的实验表明,在某些品系中,齿状回、CA3区或CA1区无法诱导LTP,但动物仍能够学习空间任务。这种明显的不匹配使得关于LTP是否是神经系统中记忆形成机制的良好模型的讨论重新兴起。本综述分析了诱导LTP或发生学习的条件,并指出了可能出现不匹配的原因以及我们能从中获得的启示。高频刺激方案和体外实验无法模拟大脑中自然的放电模式或条件。更多符合生理学的实验条件,尤其是在清醒动物身上进行的体内记录,可能会为开发与动物学习能力更好相关的学习机制改进模型指明方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验