Woodin M A, Hamakawa T, Takasaki M, Lukowiak K, Syed N I
Respiratory and Neuroscience Research Groups, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Learn Mem. 1999 May-Jun;6(3):307-16.
Neurotrophic factors participate in both developmental and adult synaptic plasticity; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Using soma-soma synapses between the identified Lymnaea neurons, we demonstrate that the brain conditioned medium (CM)-derived trophic factors are required for the formation of excitatory but not the inhibitory synapse. Specifically, identified presynaptic [right pedal dorsal 1 (RPeD1) and visceral dorsal 4 (VD4)] and postsynaptic [visceral dorsal 2/3 (VD2/3) and left pedal dorsal 1 (LPeD1)] neurons were soma-soma paired either in the absence or presence of CM. We show that in defined medium (DM-does not contain extrinsic trophic factors), appropriate excitatory synapses failed to develop between RPeD1 and VD2/3. Instead, inappropriate inhibitory synapses formed between VD2/3 and RPeD1. Similarly, mutual inhibitory synapses developed between VD4 and LPeD1 in DM. These inhibitory synapses were termed novel because they do not exist in the intact brain. To test whether DM-induced, inappropriate inhibitory synapses could be corrected by the addition of CM, cells were first paired in DM for an initial period of 12 hr. DM was then replaced with CM, and simultaneous intracellular recordings were made from paired cells after 6-12 hr of CM substitution. Not only did CM induce the formation of appropriate excitatory synapses between both cell pairs, but it also reduced the incidence of inappropriate inhibitory synapse formation. The CM-induced plasticity of synaptic connections involved new protein synthesis and transcription and was mediated via receptor tyrosine kinases. Taken together, our data provide the first direct insight into the cellular mechanism underlying trophic factor-induced specificity and plasticity of synaptic connections between soma-soma paired Lymnaea neurons.
神经营养因子参与发育和成年期的突触可塑性;然而,其潜在机制仍不清楚。利用已鉴定的椎实螺神经元之间的体-体突触,我们证明脑条件培养基(CM)衍生的营养因子是兴奋性突触形成所必需的,但对抑制性突触形成并非必需。具体而言,将已鉴定的突触前[右足背1(RPeD1)和内脏背4(VD4)]和突触后[内脏背2/3(VD2/3)和左足背1(LPeD1)]神经元在无CM或有CM的情况下进行体-体配对。我们发现,在限定培养基(DM - 不含外源性营养因子)中,RPeD1和VD2/3之间无法形成适当的兴奋性突触。相反,VD2/3和RPeD1之间形成了不适当的抑制性突触。同样,在DM中VD4和LPeD1之间形成了相互抑制性突触。这些抑制性突触被称为新型突触,因为它们在完整大脑中不存在。为了测试添加CM是否可以纠正DM诱导的不适当抑制性突触,细胞首先在DM中配对12小时。然后用CM替换DM,并在CM替换6 - 12小时后对配对细胞进行同步细胞内记录。CM不仅诱导了两个细胞对之间适当兴奋性突触的形成,还降低了不适当抑制性突触形成的发生率。CM诱导的突触连接可塑性涉及新的蛋白质合成和转录,并通过受体酪氨酸激酶介导。综上所述,我们的数据首次直接揭示了营养因子诱导的体-体配对椎实螺神经元之间突触连接特异性和可塑性的细胞机制。