Lawrence M, Jones L, Lancaster T, Daly E, Banks E
University Department of Primary Health Care, Institute of Health Sciences, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Fam Pract. 1999 Aug;16(4):335-42. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.4.335.
We aimed to describe the longitudinal pattern of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) consumption in a cohort of long-term users (defined as use for >1 year).
We carried out longitudinal analysis of prescription data derived from GPs' computer records. Subjects were recruited through 15 general practices in the former Oxford, South West and North West Thames Regions that contributed to the VAMP/OPCS general practice research database. All women in the practices aged 45-64 years in September 1991 were identified. Of these, the analysis concerned the 1224 long-term users and 1154 non-user controls who remained in the practices from September 1991 to March 1995; 868 (71%) of the users and 698 (61%) of the controls also provided questionnaire data.
The prevalence of HRT use was 15% in 1992, a rise of 16% from 1991. The prevalence of long-term use was 10%; 22% of the cohort identified as taking HRT between April and September 1991 had left the practices or were not taking HRT 1 year later. But for the group defined as long-term users in 1992, the rate of discontinuation was less than 5% per year over the following 2 1/2 years. Users of opposed therapy were 50% more likely to discontinue than users of unopposed therapy. Almost all women who had or had not undergone hysterectomy were taking unopposed or opposed therapy, respectively. Over 80% of prescriptions were for oral therapy. A third of users of either opposed or unopposed therapy changed the formulation during the 4 years of observation, and two-thirds of those who used both forms changed at least once in addition. Two changes were required to accommodate 94% of users.
Once women have taken HRT for a year, their continuation rate is over 95% per annum. Although the majority of women stayed with one formulation, a substantial minority changed formulation quite frequently, three formulations being required to accommodate 94% of long-term users over 4 years. Any trial of HRT use will need to recruit long-term users and allow for change in formulation of HRT in its protocol.
我们旨在描述一组长期使用者(定义为使用超过1年)中激素替代疗法(HRT)的使用纵向模式。
我们对从全科医生计算机记录中获取的处方数据进行纵向分析。研究对象通过前牛津、泰晤士河西南部和西北部地区的15家全科诊所招募,这些诊所为VAMP/OPCS全科医疗研究数据库提供数据。确定了1991年9月所有年龄在45 - 64岁的诊所女性。其中,分析涉及1991年9月至1995年3月期间仍在诊所的1224名长期使用者和1154名非使用者对照;868名(71%)使用者和698名(61%)对照也提供了问卷数据。
1992年HRT的使用率为15%,比1991年上升了16%。长期使用率为10%;1991年4月至9月期间确定服用HRT的队列中,22%的人在1年后离开了诊所或不再服用HRT。但对于1992年定义为长期使用者的群体,在接下来的2.5年中,停药率每年低于5%。联合治疗的使用者停药的可能性比单纯治疗的使用者高50%。几乎所有进行过或未进行过子宫切除术的女性分别采用单纯治疗或联合治疗。超过80%的处方为口服治疗。在4年的观察期内,联合治疗或单纯治疗的使用者中有三分之一改变了用药配方,而同时使用两种配方的使用者中有三分之二至少改变过一次。需要两种改变来满足94%的使用者。
一旦女性服用HRT满一年,她们的年持续率超过95%。尽管大多数女性使用一种配方,但相当一部分少数女性频繁更换配方,4年中需要三种配方来满足94%的长期使用者。任何HRT使用试验都需要招募长期使用者,并在其方案中考虑HRT配方的变化。