Lancaster T, Surman G, Lawrence M, Mant D, Vessey M, Thorogood M, Yudkin P, Daly E
Imperial Cancer Research Fund General Practice Research Group, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49(4):389-94. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.4.389.
To assess the feasibility of recruiting a cohort of women, including long term users of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT), through computerised general practice prescribing records, and to compare clinical and demographic characteristics of users and non-user controls.
Cross sectional analysis of questionnaire data.
Subjects were recruited through 17 general practices in the Oxfordshire, south west Thames, and north west Thames regions that contributed to the VAMP Research Database.
A total of 2964 women aged 45-64 years were identified. Altogether 1482 were long term (> 1 year) users of HRT and 1482 were non-user controls: 1037 (70%) of the users and 819 (55.3%) of the controls agreed to participate and provided questionnaire data.
Users of HRT were more likely to have undergone hysterectomy than controls. Most women with a history of hysterectomy used unopposed oestrogen, while those with intact uteri generally used a combination of oestrogen and a progestagen. Among women who had undergone hysterectomy, HRT users did not differ significantly from controls over a range of demographic and clinical characteristics but they were more likely to be past users of oral contraceptives. Among women with intact uteri, users were similar to controls in terms of reported clinical characteristics, but were of higher social class and were more likely to be past users of oral contraceptives and to have had a mammogram after the age of 50. Compared with the general population, all categories of women recruited to the study were of higher social class and exhibited more health conscious behaviours.
Electronic general practice prescribing records provide a feasible and efficient method for recruiting women to a cohort of HRT. Women who agreed to participate in this study were not representative of the general population, emphasising the importance of internal controls in such a study. Among participants, HRT users who had not undergone hysterectomy showed evidence of better health than non-users on some dimensions. In the whole sample, however, there were no appreciable differences in social class and self reported health indicators between users and controls.
通过计算机化的全科医疗处方记录评估招募一组女性(包括绝经后激素替代疗法(HRT)的长期使用者)的可行性,并比较使用者与非使用者对照的临床和人口统计学特征。
问卷数据的横断面分析。
通过牛津郡、泰晤士河西南部和泰晤士河西北部地区的17家全科医疗诊所招募受试者,这些诊所为VAMP研究数据库提供数据。
共识别出2964名年龄在45 - 64岁之间的女性。其中1482名是HRT的长期使用者(超过1年),1482名是非使用者对照:1037名(70%)使用者和819名(55.3%)对照同意参与并提供问卷数据。
HRT使用者比对照更有可能接受过子宫切除术。大多数有子宫切除史的女性使用单纯雌激素,而子宫完整的女性通常使用雌激素和孕激素的组合。在接受过子宫切除术的女性中,HRT使用者在一系列人口统计学和临床特征方面与对照无显著差异,但她们更有可能是口服避孕药的既往使用者。在子宫完整的女性中,使用者在报告的临床特征方面与对照相似,但社会阶层较高,更有可能是口服避孕药的既往使用者,并且在50岁以后更有可能进行过乳房X光检查。与一般人群相比,招募到本研究中的所有类别女性社会阶层都较高,并且表现出更注重健康的行为。
电子全科医疗处方记录为招募女性进入HRT队列提供了一种可行且有效的方法。同意参与本研究的女性不代表一般人群,强调了此类研究中内部对照的重要性。在参与者中,未接受子宫切除术的HRT使用者在某些方面显示出比非使用者更健康的证据。然而,在整个样本中,使用者和对照在社会阶层和自我报告的健康指标方面没有明显差异。