Burger H, de Laet C E, Weel A E, Hofman A, Pols H A
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical School, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bone. 1999 Sep;25(3):369-74. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00173-8.
Hip fractures constitute a major health problem. For effective prevention, high-risk groups need to be identified. The objective here was to develop hip fracture risk scores while assessing the added value of bone mineral density relative to more conventional risk indicators. We prospectively followed during 4 years a cohort of 5208 persons (2193 men) aged 55 years and over from the Rotterdam Study, a population-based cohort study conducted in the Netherlands. Risk scores for hip fracture were constructed using several conventional risk indicators requiring interview and anthropometry only, and bone mineral density. During follow-up, 50 persons (14 men) suffered hip fracture. Hip fracture risk was independently determined by age, gender, height, the use of a walking aid, cigarette smoking, and either bone mineral density or weight. We developed two risk scores, with and without bone mineral density. The observed 4-year risk ranged from 3/3389 (0.1%) to 17/169 (10.1%) for the lowest and highest category of the score including bone mineral density, respectively. For the score without bone mineral density, these risks were 8/3117 (0.3%) and 16/144 (11.1%), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve indicating discriminatory power was 0.88 for the risk score including, and 0.83 for the score excluding, bone mineral density (p for difference = 0.04). In conclusion, risk scores with and without bone mineral density measurement can be used for hip fracture risk assessment in elderly persons. While the score with bone mineral density has a modestly better performance, the score requiring interview and anthropometry only may be especially useful in primary care settings.
髋部骨折是一个重大的健康问题。为了有效预防,需要识别高危人群。本文的目的是开发髋部骨折风险评分,同时评估骨密度相对于更传统风险指标的附加价值。我们对来自荷兰鹿特丹研究的5208名年龄在55岁及以上的人群(2193名男性)进行了为期4年的前瞻性随访,该研究是一项基于人群的队列研究。使用仅需访谈和人体测量的几个传统风险指标以及骨密度构建髋部骨折风险评分。在随访期间,50人(14名男性)发生了髋部骨折。髋部骨折风险由年龄、性别、身高、使用助行器情况、吸烟以及骨密度或体重独立决定。我们开发了两个风险评分,一个包含骨密度,一个不包含骨密度。对于包含骨密度的评分,最低和最高类别观察到的4年风险分别为3/3389(0.1%)和17/169(10.1%)。对于不包含骨密度的评分,这些风险分别为8/3117(0.3%)和16/144(11.1%)。包含骨密度的风险评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积显示其判别能力为0.88,不包含骨密度的评分为0.83(差异p = 0.04)。总之,包含和不包含骨密度测量的风险评分均可用于老年人髋部骨折风险评估。虽然包含骨密度的评分表现略好,但仅需访谈和人体测量的评分在初级保健环境中可能特别有用。