LeBlanc E S, Viscoli C M, Henrich J B
Department of Internal Medicine, Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oregon, USA.
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;8(6):815-23. doi: 10.1089/152460999319138.
Previous studies have reported that breast cancer patients who used estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) have more favorable tumor characteristics and decreased mortality compared with nonusers. However, these findings may be due partly to increased medical surveillance in ERT users and detection of early stage tumors. Postmenopausal women with biopsy-proven breast cancer (n = 108) were identified based on their participation in screening mammography. Based on self-administered questionnaires completed at the time of mammography, 29 of these were users of ERT. Tumor characteristics (histology size, nodal status, and estrogen receptor content) of ERT users were compared with those of nonusers. After adjusting for potentially confounding variables, the odds ratios (OR) describing the relationship between ERT use and the risk of invasive histopathology (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.48, 3.75), positive nodes (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 0.59, 10.10), size > or = 2.0 cm (OR = 2.34, CI = 0.66, 8.27), or negative estrogen receptor status (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.18, 9.38) were > 1, although none reached statistical significance. When the subjects were separated into two prognostic groups based on the presence or absence of adverse prognostic indices, ERT users had a statistically significantly increased risk of being in the poor prognostic group (tumor size > or = 2.0 cm or positive nodes or negative estrogen receptor content) (OR = 4.48, 95% CI = 1.10, 18.30). The risk was highest in current users (OR = 6.28, 95% CI = 1.16, 34.00), users for 5 or more years (OR = 7.77, 95% CI = 1.09, 55.60), and users of nonconjugated estrogen (OR = 9.63, 95% CI = 1.18, 78.60). Although our sample size is small and we do not currently have information on long-term outcomes, the findings from this screening population suggest that ERT may have an adverse effect on important breast cancer prognostic indices.
以往研究报告称,与未使用雌激素替代疗法(ERT)的乳腺癌患者相比,使用该疗法的患者具有更有利的肿瘤特征且死亡率降低。然而,这些发现可能部分归因于ERT使用者接受了更多的医学监测以及早期肿瘤的检出。基于参与乳腺钼靶筛查,确定了108例经活检证实患有乳腺癌的绝经后女性。根据她们在乳腺钼靶检查时填写的自填问卷,其中29例为ERT使用者。将ERT使用者的肿瘤特征(组织学类型、大小、淋巴结状态和雌激素受体含量)与未使用者进行比较。在对潜在的混杂变量进行调整后,描述ERT使用与浸润性组织病理学风险(比值比[OR]=1.35,95%置信区间[CI]=0.48,3.75)、阳性淋巴结(OR=2.43,95%CI=0.59,10.10)、大小≥2.0 cm(OR=2.34,CI=0.66,8.27)或雌激素受体阴性状态(OR=1.08,95%CI=0.18,9.38)之间关系的OR均>1,尽管均未达到统计学显著性。当根据不良预后指标的有无将受试者分为两个预后组时,ERT使用者处于预后不良组(肿瘤大小≥2.0 cm或阳性淋巴结或雌激素受体阴性含量)的风险在统计学上显著增加(OR=4.48,95%CI=1.10,18.30)。当前使用者的风险最高(OR=6.28,95%CI=1.16,34.00),使用5年或更长时间的使用者(OR=7.77,95%CI=1.09,55.60),以及使用非共轭雌激素的使用者(OR=9.63,95%CI=1.18,78.60)。尽管我们的样本量较小且目前没有关于长期结果的信息,但来自这个筛查人群的结果表明,ERT可能对重要的乳腺癌预后指标有不利影响。