• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理式行为健康护理中的风险分担。

Risk sharing in managed behavioral health care.

作者信息

Rosenthal M B

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1999 Sep-Oct;18(5):204-13. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.5.204.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.18.5.204
PMID:10495608
Abstract

While policymakers have expressed concern over the impact of risk sharing with providers on treatment patterns, the literature lacks decisive evidence on which to base policy. This paper evaluates the impact of a contracting change within a managed behavioral health organization from a fee-for-service system to a case-rate system with utilization management delegated to providers. The contracting change resulted in a 25 percent reduction in mental health visits per episode. This effect varies with the dollar amount of the case rate and is more pronounced for providers with a larger share of revenue from risk contracts and with intensive utilization management programs.

摘要

虽然政策制定者对与医疗服务提供者分担风险对治疗模式的影响表示担忧,但文献中缺乏可供政策依据的确凿证据。本文评估了一家管理式行为健康组织内从按服务收费系统转变为将利用管理委托给医疗服务提供者的按病例计费系统的影响。合同变更导致每次发作的心理健康就诊次数减少了25%。这种影响因病例费率的金额而异,对于来自风险合同收入占比更大且拥有强化利用管理计划的医疗服务提供者来说更为明显。

相似文献

1
Risk sharing in managed behavioral health care.管理式行为健康护理中的风险分担。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1999 Sep-Oct;18(5):204-13. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.5.204.
2
How does risk sharing between employers and a managed behavioral health organization affect mental health care?雇主与管理式行为健康组织之间的风险分担如何影响心理健康护理?
Health Serv Res. 2000 Oct;35(4):761-76.
3
The top six challenges for capitated providers.
Capitation Manag Rep. 1999 Nov;6(11):172-4.
4
Improving the odds.提高胜算。
Health Data Manag. 1998 Nov;6(11):58-60, 62, 64-7.
5
Risk sharing and the supply of mental health services.风险分担与心理健康服务的供给
J Health Econ. 2000 Nov;19(6):1047-65. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00063-1.
6
Choosing an advantageous risk-sharing arrangement.选择一种有利的风险分担安排。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1999 Mar;53(3):35-7.
7
Thinking outside the box essential with risk contracting ventures.对于风险承包企业而言,跳出框框思考至关重要。
Manag Care Strateg. 1998 Oct;6(10):109-12.
8
Providers wagering more than they measure in risk contracts.
Exec Solut Healthc Manag. 1998 May;1(3):13-4.
9
Does your capitation contract include these 'top 12' clauses?
Capitation Manag Rep. 1999 Mar;6(3):37-40.
10
Six ways to stop losing money on your capitation contracts.避免在你的按人头付费合同中亏损的六种方法。
Capitation Manag Rep. 2000 Nov;7(11):163-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Alternative Payment Models in Medical Oncology: Assessing Quality-of-Care Outcomes Under Partial Capitation.肿瘤内科的替代支付模式:评估部分按人头付费下的医疗质量结果。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2018 Oct;11(7):371-378.
2
Changes in how health plans provide behavioral health services.健康计划提供行为健康服务方式的变化。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2009 Jan;36(1):11-24. doi: 10.1007/s11414-007-9084-0. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
3
Does type of gatekeeping model affect access to outpatient specialty mental health services?守门人模式的类型会影响门诊专科心理健康服务的可及性吗?
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):104-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00609.x.
4
Mental health policy and psychotropic drugs.心理健康政策与精神药物
Milbank Q. 2005;83(2):271-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00347.x.
5
Using information to guide managed behavioral health care.利用信息指导管理式行为健康护理。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004 Jan-Mar;31(1):98-110. doi: 10.1007/BF02287342.