• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康政策与精神药物

Mental health policy and psychotropic drugs.

作者信息

Frank Richard G, Conti Rena M, Goldman Howard H

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2005;83(2):271-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00347.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00347.x
PMID:15960772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2690138/
Abstract

The pace of innovation in psychotropic drugs has been rapid over the past 15 years. There also have been unprecedented increases in spending on prescription drugs generally and psychotropic medications specifically. Psychotropic medications are playing a more central role in treatment. They also are receiving close scrutiny from health insurers, state budget makers, and ordinary citizens. Public policy actions regarding prescription drugs have the potential to significantly affect clinical care for mental disorders, the costs of this care to individuals and society at large, and the prospects for future scientific advances. This article outlines the policy issues related to psychotropic drugs with respect to their role in determining access to mental health treatment and the cost and quality of mental health care.

摘要

在过去15年里,精神药物的创新步伐一直很快。总体而言,处方药支出,尤其是精神药物支出也出现了前所未有的增长。精神药物在治疗中发挥着越来越核心的作用。它们也受到了健康保险公司、州预算制定者和普通公民的密切关注。有关处方药的公共政策行动有可能显著影响精神障碍的临床护理、个人和整个社会为此护理承担的成本,以及未来科学进步的前景。本文概述了与精神药物相关的政策问题,涉及它们在决定获得心理健康治疗的机会以及心理健康护理的成本和质量方面所起的作用。

相似文献

1
Mental health policy and psychotropic drugs.心理健康政策与精神药物
Milbank Q. 2005;83(2):271-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00347.x.
2
Dual eligibles with mental disorders and Medicare part D: how are they faring?患有精神障碍的双重资格者与医疗保险D部分:他们的情况如何?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):746-59. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.746.
3
Managing psychotropic drug costs: will formularies work?管控精神药物成本:药品处方集能起作用吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Sep-Oct;22(5):84-96. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.5.84.
4
Improving psychiatric drug benefit management: IV. Experiences of a pharmacy advisory committee.
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Nov;55(11):1210-2. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.11.1210.
5
Trends in mental health cost growth: an expanded role for management?心理健康成本增长趋势:管理的作用是否应扩大?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):649-59. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.649.
6
Implications of Part D for mentally ill dual eligibles: a challenge for Medicare.《医疗保险处方药计划(Part D)》对患有精神疾病的双重资格者的影响:医疗保险面临的一项挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Mar-Apr;25(2):491-500. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.2.491.
7
Pharmaceuticals & psychotropic drugs.药品和精神药物。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):723. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.723.
8
Use and cost of psychotropic drugs among recipients with autism in a state Medicaid fee-for-service programme.在一个州医疗补助按服务收费计划中,自闭症患者使用和花费精神药物的情况。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Feb;57(2):161-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01563.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
9
Increases in Medicare prescription drug plan costs attributable to psychotropic medications.医疗保险处方药计划成本因精神药物而增加。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;16(8):674-85. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181794591.
10
Comparative prevalence of psychotropic medications among youths enrolled in the SCHIP and privately insured youths.参加儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的青少年与参加私人保险的青少年中精神药物的比较患病率。
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Sep;55(9):1049-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.9.1049.

引用本文的文献

1
The Geography of Mental Health, Urbanicity, and Affluence.心理健康的地理学:城市性与富裕程度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 7;20(8):5440. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085440.
2
Dry mouth effects from drugs used for depression, anxiety, schizophrenia and bipolar mood disorder in adults: systematic review.成人使用治疗抑郁症、焦虑症、精神分裂症和双相情感障碍药物导致的口干效应:系统评价
BJPsych Open. 2023 Mar 20;9(2):e53. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.15.
3
Potential Drug Interactions Between Psychotropics and Intravenous Chemotherapeutics Used by Patients With Cancer.癌症患者使用的精神药物与静脉化疗药物之间的潜在药物相互作用。
J Pharm Technol. 2022 Jun;38(3):159-168. doi: 10.1177/87551225211073942. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
4
Autophagy Induction as a Host-Directed Therapeutic Strategy against Infection.自噬诱导作为一种针对 感染的宿主定向治疗策略。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 23;57(6):522. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060522.
5
The Association of Physical (in)Activity with Mental Health. Differences between Elder and Younger Populations: A Systematic Literature Review.体力活动与心理健康的关系。老年人群和年轻人群的差异:系统文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 29;18(9):4771. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094771.
6
Unmet mental health and substance use treatment needs among older homeless adults: Results from the HOPE HOME Study.老年无家可归成年人的心理健康和物质使用治疗需求未得到满足:来自 HOPE HOME 研究的结果。
J Community Psychol. 2019 Nov;47(8):1893-1908. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22233. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
7
Continuation of Atypical Antipsychotic Medication During Early Pregnancy and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes.继续使用非典型抗精神病药物治疗早孕与妊娠期糖尿病的风险。
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;175(6):564-574. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17040393. Epub 2018 May 7.
8
Approved and Off-Label Use of Prescribed Psychotropic Medications among Federal Canadian Inmates.加拿大联邦囚犯中经批准的和标签外使用处方精神药物的情况。
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;63(10):683-691. doi: 10.1177/0706743718773734. Epub 2018 Apr 29.
9
Shortage of psychotropic medications in community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia: Causes and solutions.沙特阿拉伯社区药房精神药物短缺:原因与解决方案。
Saudi Pharm J. 2017 Jul;25(5):744-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
10
Antipsychotic Medication Use Among Publicly Insured Pregnant Women in the United States.抗精神病药物在美国公共保险孕妇中的使用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Nov 1;68(11):1112-1119. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600408. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The efficacy of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors in depression: a meta-analysis of studies against tricyclic antidepressants.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗抑郁症的疗效:与三环类抗抑郁药对照的荟萃分析。
J Psychopharmacol. 1994 Jan;8(4):238-49. doi: 10.1177/026988119400800407.
2
U.S. spending for mental health and substance abuse treatment, 1991-2001.1991年至2001年美国在心理健康和药物滥用治疗方面的支出。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-133-W5-142. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.133.
3
Do new prescription drugs pay for themselves? The case of second-generation antipsychotics.新型处方药能实现自身成本的收回吗?以第二代抗精神病药物为例。
J Health Econ. 2005 Jan;24(1):1-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.08.001.
4
Adverse selection and the challenges to stand-alone prescription drug insurance.逆向选择与独立处方药保险面临的挑战。
Front Health Policy Res. 2004;7:55-74. doi: 10.2202/1558-9544.1051.
5
Effects of pharmaceutical promotion on adherence to the treatment guidelines for depression.药物推广对抑郁症治疗指南依从性的影响。
Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1176-85. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00004.
6
Predictability of prescription drug expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的处方药支出可预测性。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2003 Winter;25(2):37-46.
7
The effect of a managed behavioral health carve-out on quality of care for medicaid patients diagnosed as having schizophrenia.管理式行为健康分离对诊断为精神分裂症的医疗补助患者护理质量的影响。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 May;61(5):442-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.442.
8
The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R).重度抑郁症的流行病学:全国共病调查复制研究(NCS-R)结果
JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3095-105. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3095.
9
Specialty health care, treatment patterns, and quality: the impact of a mental health carve-out on care for depression.专科医疗保健、治疗模式与质量:心理健康专项保险对抑郁症护理的影响
Health Serv Res. 2002 Dec;37(6):1583-601. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.11092.
10
Cost-effectiveness of antidepressant medications.抗抑郁药物的成本效益
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 1998 Oct 1;1(3):109-117. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-176x(1998100)1:3<109::aid-mhp15>3.0.co;2-2.