Kvestad E, Lunde K, Markestad T J, Førde R
Det medisinske fakultet Universitetet i Oslo.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999 Aug 30;119(20):3015-8.
The aim of this questionnaire survey was to investigate whether Norwegian hospitals have guidelines for lifesaving treatment in cases of extreme prematurity and severe morbidity. 66 out of 71 doctors in charge of Norwegian obstetric and paediatric units answered our questionnaire. 79% of the units had guidelines for starting medical treatment, 45% for ending treatment. Gestational age and the infant's vitality were the most important criteria in decisions concerning withholding of treatment. Two out of three units (44) had a lower gestational age limit, varying from 23 to 25 weeks; 41 of these 44 units used 23 or 24 weeks as the lower limit. Disability risk and the infants' suffering were the most important criteria for termination of treatment. One in five respondents attached little or no emphasis on the infants' suffering. Half of the respondents reported that they felt that making life or death decisions for premature infants had become more difficult over the last few years. Unrealistic expectations and pressure from the media and from parents were important reasons for this. We conclude equality of treatment for premature infants calls for an examination of all factors, medical and psychosocial, with a bearing on decisions.
本次问卷调查的目的是调查挪威医院是否针对极早产儿和重症病例制定了挽救生命治疗的指南。挪威71家产科和儿科单位的负责人中有66位医生回复了我们的问卷。79%的单位有开始医疗治疗的指南,45%的单位有终止治疗的指南。胎龄和婴儿的活力是决定停止治疗时最重要的标准。三分之二的单位(44家)有较低的胎龄限制,从23周到25周不等;这44家单位中有41家将23周或24周作为下限。残疾风险和婴儿的痛苦是终止治疗的最重要标准。五分之一的受访者很少或根本不重视婴儿的痛苦。一半的受访者表示,他们觉得在过去几年里,为早产儿做出生死决定变得更加困难。不切实际的期望以及来自媒体和家长的压力是造成这种情况的重要原因。我们得出结论,要实现对早产儿的平等治疗,就需要审视所有与决策相关的因素,包括医学因素和社会心理因素。