Suppr超能文献

用于牙根覆盖的冠向推进瓣手术。牙根表面的处理:根面平整与抛光。

Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Treatment of root surface: root planning versus polishing.

作者信息

Pini-Prato G, Baldi C, Pagliaro U, Nieri M, Saletta D, Rotundo R, Cortellini P

机构信息

Dental School, University of Florence, Italy.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 1999 Sep;70(9):1064-76. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.9.1064.

Abstract

This clinical study was designed to determine if mechanical instrumentation (root planing) of the exposed root is useful in treating gingival recession caused by traumatic toothbrushing following a coronally advanced flap (CAF). Ten patients with high levels of oral hygiene (full-mouth plaque score <20%), from 25 to 57 years of age, were selected for the study. Each patient showed 2 bilateral Class I or II maxillary recessions. A total of 20 recessions were treated. The difference in the recessions was < or =1 mm. In each patient, one recession was randomly assigned to the test group and the contralateral one to the control group. In the test group, the exposed root surface was polished at slow speed with a rubber cup and prophylaxis paste for 60 seconds. In the control group, the exposed root surface was planed with a sharp curet. In both test and control groups, a trapezoidal full- and partial-thickness flap was elevated, coronally displaced, and sutured to cover the treated root surface. Before treatment, the mean recession depth in the test group (polishing) was 3.1+/-1.1 mm; and in the control group (root planing), 2.9+/-1.0 mm. Three months after the described procedures, the test group (polishing) showed a mean recession reduction of 2.6+/-0.6 mm; mean percent root coverage was 89+/-14%. In the control group (root planing), the mean recession reduction was 2.3+/-0.7 mm and mean percent root coverage was 83+/-16%. The difference of recession reduction between the test and control group was not statistically significant (P = 0.1405), even though the test group showed slightly better clinical results in terms of root coverage. This prospective clinical, controlled, randomized study shows that mechanical instrumentation (root planing) of the exposed root surfaces is not necessary when shallow recessions caused by traumatic toothbrushing are treated using a coronally advanced flap (CAF) in patients with high levels of oral hygiene.

摘要

本临床研究旨在确定在冠向复位瓣(CAF)术后,对暴露牙根进行机械清创(根面平整)是否有助于治疗因创伤性刷牙导致的牙龈退缩。本研究选取了10名口腔卫生状况良好(全口菌斑评分<20%)、年龄在25至57岁之间的患者。每位患者均有2处双侧上颌I类或II类牙龈退缩。共计20处牙龈退缩接受治疗,退缩程度差异≤1mm。在每位患者中,随机将一处牙龈退缩分配至试验组,对侧牙龈退缩分配至对照组。试验组中,使用橡胶杯和预防性糊剂以低速对暴露的牙根表面进行抛光60秒。对照组中,使用锐利刮匙对暴露的牙根表面进行根面平整。试验组和对照组均掀起梯形全厚和部分厚度瓣,向冠方移位并缝合以覆盖处理后的牙根表面。治疗前,试验组(抛光组)的平均退缩深度为3.1±1.1mm;对照组(根面平整组)为2.9±1.0mm。在所述操作3个月后,试验组(抛光组)的平均退缩减少量为2.6±0.6mm;平均牙根覆盖百分比为89±14%。对照组(根面平整组)的平均退缩减少量为2.3±0.7mm,平均牙根覆盖百分比为83±16%。试验组和对照组之间的退缩减少差异无统计学意义(P = 0.1405),尽管试验组在牙根覆盖方面显示出稍好的临床效果。这项前瞻性临床对照随机研究表明,对于口腔卫生状况良好的患者,在使用冠向复位瓣(CAF)治疗因创伤性刷牙导致的浅度牙龈退缩时,对暴露的牙根表面进行机械清创(根面平整)并非必要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验