• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类中的观察者间可靠性]

[Inter-observer reliability in the classification of thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries].

作者信息

Blauth M, Bastian L, Knop C, Lange U, Tusch G

机构信息

Unfallchirurgische Klinik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

Orthopade. 1999 Aug;28(8):662-81. doi: 10.1007/s001320050397.

DOI:10.1007/s001320050397
PMID:10506370
Abstract

The purpose of a fracture classification is to help the surgeon to choose an appropriate method of treatment for each and every fracture occurring in a particular anatomical region. The classification tool should not only suggest a method of treatment, it should also provide the surgeon with a reasonably precise estimation of the outcome of that treatment. But to use a classification before its workability has been proved is inappropriate and can lead to confusion and more conflicting results. Any classification system should be proved to be a workable tool before it is used in a discriminatory or predictive manner. The radiographs of fourteen fractures of the lumbar spine were used to assess the interobserver reliability of the AO classification system. The radiographs and CT scans were reviewed in twenty-two hospitals experienced with spinal trauma. The mean interobserver agreement for all fourteen cases was found to be 67% (41-91%), when only the three main types (A, B, C) were used. The corresponding kappa value of the interobserver reliability showed a coefficient of 0.33 (range, 0.30 to 0.35). The reliability decreased by increasing the categories. For some injuries the interobserver reliability was found to be over 90% and also for the recommended therapeutic procedure there was an acceptable agreement. But the decision between an posterior approach alone or an additionally anterior procedure seems to be the most important question in treatment of spinal injuries at that time.

摘要

骨折分类的目的是帮助外科医生为特定解剖区域发生的每一例骨折选择合适的治疗方法。分类工具不仅应建议一种治疗方法,还应向外科医生提供该治疗结果的合理精确估计。但在其可行性得到证明之前就使用分类是不合适的,可能会导致混淆和更多相互矛盾的结果。任何分类系统在以区分或预测方式使用之前,都应被证明是一种可行的工具。使用腰椎的14例骨折的X线片来评估AO分类系统的观察者间可靠性。在22家有脊柱创伤经验的医院对X线片和CT扫描进行了复查。当仅使用三种主要类型(A、B、C)时,发现所有14例病例的观察者间平均一致性为67%(41%-91%)。观察者间可靠性的相应kappa值显示系数为0.33(范围为0.30至0.35)。随着分类的增加,可靠性降低。对于某些损伤,观察者间可靠性超过90%,并且对于推荐的治疗程序也有可接受的一致性。但当时,单纯后路手术还是额外加做前路手术之间的抉择似乎是脊柱损伤治疗中最重要的问题。

相似文献

1
[Inter-observer reliability in the classification of thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries].[胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类中的观察者间可靠性]
Orthopade. 1999 Aug;28(8):662-81. doi: 10.1007/s001320050397.
2
Classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries: An analysis of interobserver reliability.
Orthopade. 1999 Aug;28(8):662-681. doi: 10.1007/PL00003655.
3
Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: A comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model.与其他骨折分类系统相比,胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统的观察者间和观察者内一致性是否更低?:以股骨近端转子区骨折作为对比模型的比较研究
Injury. 2016 Apr;47(4):859-64. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.016. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
4
Reliability and Agreement of Different Spine Fracture Classification Systems: An Independent Intraobserver and Interobserver Study.不同脊柱骨折分类系统的可靠性与一致性:一项独立的观察者内和观察者间研究
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:e695-e702. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.138. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
5
Reliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naïve spinal surgeons.由全球一组经验不足的脊柱外科医生对AOSpine胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统进行的可靠性分析。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Apr;25(4):1082-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3765-9. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
6
An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.新型AOSpine胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统的独立观察者间可靠性及观察者内可重复性评估
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 1;40(1):E54-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000656.
7
Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons.多位外科医生使用的两种胸腰椎骨折分类系统的评估
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jul;87(7):1423-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01530.
8
The Reliability of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Classification System in Children: Results of a Multicenter Study.儿童AOSpine胸腰椎分类系统的可靠性:一项多中心研究的结果
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 May/Jun;40(5):e352-e356. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001521.
9
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.胸腰椎爆裂骨折评估中负荷分担分类的观察者间及观察者内信度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Feb 1;30(3):354-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152095.85927.24.
10
MDCT in emergency radiology: is a standardized chest or abdominal protocol sufficient for evaluation of thoracic and lumbar spine trauma?急诊放射学中的多层螺旋CT:标准化的胸部或腹部扫描方案是否足以评估胸腰椎创伤?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Oct;183(4):959-68. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.4.1830959.

引用本文的文献

1
Computed Tomography Findings and Classification of Traumatic Lumbosacral Spine Injuries: Insights from the AOSpine Classification System.创伤性腰骶椎损伤的计算机断层扫描结果与分类:来自AO脊柱分类系统的见解
Orthop Res Rev. 2024 Jan 26;16:35-42. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S444675. eCollection 2024.
2
Reliability and repeatability of a modified thoracolumbar spine injury classification scoring system.改良胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类评分系统的可靠性和可重复性
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1054031. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1054031. eCollection 2022.
3
The Effect of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification in the Clinical Outcome of Operative and Non-Operative Treatments.
胸腰椎损伤分类对手术和非手术治疗临床结果的影响
Cureus. 2021 Jan 2;13(1):e12428. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12428.
4
AOSpine-Spine Trauma Classification System: The Value of Modifiers: A Narrative Review With Commentary on Evolving Descriptive Principles.AO脊柱-脊柱创伤分类系统:修正符的价值:一篇叙述性综述及对不断发展的描述原则的评论
Global Spine J. 2019 May;9(1 Suppl):77S-88S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219827260. Epub 2019 May 8.
5
Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by Chinese spinal surgeons.中国脊柱外科医生对AOSpine胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统的可靠性和可重复性分析
Eur Spine J. 2017 May;26(5):1477-1482. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4842-4. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
6
Reliability assessment of AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system and Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) for thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a multicentre study.AOSpine胸腰椎损伤分类系统和胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLICS)对胸腰椎损伤的可靠性评估:一项多中心研究的结果
Eur Spine J. 2017 May;26(5):1470-1476. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4663-5. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
7
MRI Inter-Reader and Intra-Reader Reliabilities for Assessing Injury Morphology and Posterior Ligamentous Complex Integrity of the Spine According to the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Severity Score.根据胸腰椎损伤分类系统和严重程度评分,评估脊柱损伤形态和后韧带复合体完整性的MRI阅片者间及阅片者内可靠性
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Jul-Aug;16(4):889-98. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.4.889. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
8
Management of thoracolumbar spine trauma: An overview.胸腰椎脊柱创伤的管理:概述
Indian J Orthop. 2015 Jan-Feb;49(1):72-82. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.143914.
9
Do we have an ideal classification system for thoracolumbar and subaxial cervical spine injuries: what is the expert's perspective?我们是否拥有针对胸腰椎和下颈椎损伤的理想分类系统:专家观点是什么?
Spinal Cord. 2015 Jan;53(1):42-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.194. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
10
Thoracolumbar spine trauma: Evaluation and surgical decision-making.胸腰椎脊柱创伤:评估与手术决策
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2013 Jan;4(1):3-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.121616.