Lee Guen Young, Lee Joon Woo, Choi Seung Woo, Lim Hyun Jin, Sun Hye Young, Kang Yusuhn, Chai Jee Won, Kim Sujin, Kang Heung Sik
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 463-707, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 463-707, Korea. ; Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Jul-Aug;16(4):889-98. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.4.889. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
To evaluate spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) inter-reader and intra-reader reliabilities using the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score (TLICS) and to analyze the effects of reader experience on reliability and the possible reasons for discordant interpretations.
Six radiologists (two senior, two junior radiologists, and two residents) independently scored 100 MRI examinations of thoracolumbar spine injuries to assess injury morphology and posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity according to the TLICS. Inter-reader and intra-reader agreements were determined and analyzed according to the number of years of radiologist experience.
Inter-reader agreement between the six readers was moderate (k = 0.538 for the first and 0.537 for the second review) for injury morphology and fair to moderate (k = 0.440 for the first and 0.389 for the second review) for PLC integrity. No significant difference in inter-reader agreement was observed according to the number of years of radiologist experience. Intra-reader agreements showed a wide range (k = 0.538-0.822 for injury morphology and 0.423-0.616 for PLC integrity). Agreement was achieved in 44 for the first and 45 for the second review about injury morphology, as well as in 41 for the first and 38 for the second review of PLC integrity. A positive correlation was detected between injury morphology score and PLC integrity.
The reliability of MRI for assessing thoracolumbar spinal injuries according to the TLICS was moderate for injury morphology and fair to moderate for PLC integrity, which may not be influenced by radiologist' experience.
使用胸腰椎损伤分类系统及严重程度评分(TLICS)评估脊柱磁共振成像(MRI)在不同阅片者之间以及同一阅片者自身的可靠性,并分析阅片者经验对可靠性的影响以及解读不一致的可能原因。
六位放射科医生(两位资深医生、两位初级放射科医生和两位住院医师)根据TLICS独立对100例胸腰椎脊柱损伤的MRI检查进行评分,以评估损伤形态和后韧带复合体(PLC)的完整性。根据放射科医生的经验年限确定并分析不同阅片者之间以及同一阅片者自身的一致性。
六位阅片者之间对于损伤形态的一致性为中等(第一次复查时k = 0.538,第二次复查时k = 0.537),对于PLC完整性的一致性为一般至中等(第一次复查时k = 0.440,第二次复查时k = 0.389)。根据放射科医生的经验年限,未观察到不同阅片者之间一致性的显著差异。同一阅片者自身的一致性范围较广(对于损伤形态k = 0.538 - 0.822,对于PLC完整性k = 0.423 - 0.616)。第一次复查时有44例在损伤形态方面达成一致,第二次复查时有45例;第一次复查时有41例在PLC完整性方面达成一致,第二次复查时有38例。损伤形态评分与PLC完整性之间存在正相关。
根据TLICS,MRI评估胸腰椎脊柱损伤时,对于损伤形态的可靠性为中等,对于PLC完整性的可靠性为一般至中等,这可能不受放射科医生经验的影响。