Annett M
Psychology Department, University of Leicester, UK.
Schizophr Res. 1999 Oct 19;39(3):177-82. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(99)00072-9.
The right shift (RS) theory (Annett, M., 1972. The distribution of manual asymmetry. Br. J. Psychol. 63, 343-358; Annett, M., 1985. Left, Right, Hand and Brain: The Right Shift Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum, London) suggests that the typical pattern of human cerebral and manual asymmetries depends on a single gene (RS+) which impairs speech-related cortex of the right hemisphere. The theory offers solutions to several puzzles, including the distribution of handedness in families (Annett, M., 1978. A Single Gene Explanation of Right and Left Handedness and Brainedness. Lanchester Polytechnic, Coventry; Annett, M., 1996. In defense of the right shift theory. Percept. Motor Skills 82, 115-137), relations between handedness and cerebral speech laterality (Annett, M., 1975. Hand preference and the laterality of cerebral speech. Cortex 11, 305-328; Annett, M., Alexander, M.P., 1996. Atypical cerebral dominance: predictions and tests of the right shift theory. Neuropsychologia 34, 1215-1227) and handedness and dyslexia (Annett, M. et al., 1996. Types of dyslexia and the shift to dextrality. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 37, 167-180). If Crow's (Crow, T.J. et al., 1989. Schizophrenia as an anomaly of development of cerebral asymmetry. A postmortem study and a proposal concerning the genetic basis of the disease. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 46, 1145-1150; Crow, T.J., 1997. Is schizophrenia the price that Homo sapiens pays for language? Schizophr. Res. 28, 127-141) theory that schizophrenia is due to an anomaly of cerebral dominance is correct, and if the RS theory is correct, schizophrenia could be due to an anomaly of the RS+ gene. If the RS+ gene were at risk for a mutation which caused a loss of directional coding, the mutant could be described as 'agnosic' for left and right. Such a gene would impair either hemisphere at random. When paired with another RS+ gene, both hemispheres would be impaired in 50% of cases. The other 50% and people in whom the agnosic gene is paired with an RS-allele (neutral for asymmetry and not giving hemisphere impairment) would have one unaffected hemisphere and, thus, normal development. Quantitative predictions based on the RS genetic theory as previously developed, plus an agnosic mutant with frequency required to give schizophrenia in 1% of the population, are consistent with estimates of concordance for schizophrenia in relatives. Homozygotes of the agnosic mutant would occur at about the rate estimated for autism.
右移(RS)理论(安妮特,M.,1972年。《手部不对称的分布》。《英国心理学杂志》63卷,第343 - 358页;安妮特,M.,1985年。《左、右、手与脑:右移理论》。劳伦斯·埃尔鲍姆出版社,伦敦)表明,人类大脑和手部不对称的典型模式取决于一个单一基因(RS +),该基因会损害右半球与言语相关的皮层。该理论为几个谜题提供了解决方案,包括家族中利手的分布(安妮特,M.,1978年。《对右利手和左利手及脑型的单基因解释》。兰开斯特理工学院,考文垂;安妮特,M.,1996年。《为右移理论辩护》。《感知与运动技能》82卷,第115 - 137页)、利手与大脑言语侧化之间的关系(安妮特,M.,1975年。《手偏好与大脑言语的侧化》。《皮层》11卷,第305 - 328页;安妮特,M.,亚历山大,M.P.,1996年。《非典型大脑优势:右移理论的预测与检验》。《神经心理学》34卷,第1215 - 1227页)以及利手与诵读困难(安妮特,M.等人,1996年。《诵读困难的类型与向右利手的转变》。《儿童心理学与精神病学杂志》37卷,第167 - 180页)。如果克劳(克劳,T.J.等人,1989年。《精神分裂症作为大脑不对称发育异常:一项尸检研究及关于该疾病遗传基础的提议》。《普通精神病学文献》46卷,第1145 - 1150页;克劳,T.J.,1997年。《精神分裂症是智人为语言付出的代价吗?》。《精神分裂症研究》28卷,第127 - 141页)关于精神分裂症是由于大脑优势异常的理论是正确的,并且如果RS理论是正确的,那么精神分裂症可能是由于RS +基因异常所致。如果RS +基因存在发生导致方向编码丧失的突变的风险,那么该突变体可被描述为对左右“失认”。这样的基因会随机损害任何一个半球。当与另一个RS +基因配对时,在50%的情况下两个半球都会受损。另外50%以及失认基因与RS -等位基因(对不对称性呈中性且不会导致半球受损)配对的人会有一个未受影响的半球,从而实现正常发育。基于先前发展的RS遗传理论以及一个频率符合在1%的人群中导致精神分裂症的失认突变体所做的定量预测,与亲属中精神分裂症的一致性估计相符。失认突变体的纯合子出现的频率大约与自闭症的估计频率相当。