MacLeod R A, Dirks W G, Matsuo Y, Kaufmann M, Milch H, Drexler H G
DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany.
Int J Cancer. 1999 Nov 12;83(4):555-63. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991112)83:4<555::aid-ijc19>3.0.co;2-2.
We present a panoptic survey of cell line cross-contamination (CLCC) among original stocks of human cell lines, investigated using molecular genetic methods. The survey comprised 252 consecutive human cell lines, almost exclusively tumor-derived, submitted by their originators to the DSMZ and 5 additional cell repositories (CRs), using a combination of DNA profiling (4-locus minisatellite and multilocus microsatellite probes) and molecular cytogenetics, exploiting an interactive database (http://www.dsmz.de/). Widespread high levels of cross-contaminants (CCs) were uncovered, affecting 45 cell lines (18%) supplied by 27 of 93 originators (29%). Unlike previous reports, most CCs (42/45) occurred intraspecies, a discrepancy attributable to improved detection of the more insidious intraspecies CCs afforded by molecular methods. The most prolific CCs were classic tumor cell lines, the numbers of CCs they caused being as follows: HeLa (n = 11), T-24 (n = 4), SK-HEP-1 (n = 4), U-937 (n = 4) and HT-29 (n = 3). All 5 supposed instances of spontaneous immortalization of normal cells were spurious, due to CLCC, including ECV304, the most cited human endothelial cell line. Although high, our figure for CCs at the source sets a lower limit only as (i) many older tumor cell lines were unavailable for comparison and (ii) circulating cell lines are often obtained indirectly, rather than via originators or CRs. The misidentified cell lines reported here have already been unwittingly used in several hundreds of potentially misleading reports, including use as inappropriate tumor models and subclones masquerading as independent replicates. We believe these findings indicate a grave and chronic problem demanding radical measures, to include extra controls over cell line authentication, provenance and availability.
我们采用分子遗传学方法,对人类细胞系原始种库中的细胞系交叉污染(CLCC)情况进行了全面调查。该调查涵盖了252个连续的人类细胞系,几乎全部源自肿瘤,由其创建者提交给德国微生物和细胞培养物保藏中心(DSMZ)以及另外5个细胞库(CRs),采用了DNA谱分析(4位点小卫星和多位点微卫星探针)和分子细胞遗传学相结合的方法,并利用了一个交互式数据库(http://www.dsmz.de/)。结果发现广泛存在高水平的交叉污染物(CCs),影响了93个创建者中27个(29%)提供的45个细胞系(18%)。与之前的报告不同,大多数CCs(42/45)发生在种内,这种差异归因于分子方法对更隐匿的种内CCs检测能力的提高。最常见的CCs是经典肿瘤细胞系,它们导致的CCs数量如下:HeLa(n = 11)、T - 24(n = 4)、SK - HEP - 1(n = 4)、U - 937(n = 4)和HT - 29(n = 3)。所有5例正常细胞自发永生化的假定情况都是假的,原因是CLCC,包括被引用最多的人类内皮细胞系ECV304。尽管我们得出的源头CCs比例较高,但这只是一个下限,原因如下:(i)许多较老的肿瘤细胞系无法用于比较;(ii)流通的细胞系通常是间接获得的,而非通过创建者或细胞库。这里报告的被错误鉴定的细胞系已经在数百篇可能产生误导的报告中被无意使用,包括用作不恰当的肿瘤模型以及伪装成独立重复的亚克隆。我们认为这些发现表明存在一个严重的长期问题,需要采取激进措施,包括对细胞系鉴定、来源和可用性进行额外控制。