• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初产妇足月选择性引产的剖宫产风险。

Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women.

作者信息

Seyb S T, Berka R J, Socol M L, Dooley S L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical School, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;94(4):600-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00377-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00377-4
PMID:10511367
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the risk of cesarean delivery associated with elective induction of labor in nulliparous women at term.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study on a major urban obstetric service that serves predominantly private obstetric practices. All term, nulliparous women with vertex, singleton gestations who labored during an 8-month period (n = 1561) were divided into three groups: spontaneous labor, elective induction, and medical induction. The risk of cesarean delivery in the induction groups was determined using stepwise logistic regression to control for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Women experiencing spontaneous labor had a 7.8% cesarean delivery rate, whereas women undergoing elective labor induction had a 17.5% cesarean delivery rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12, 3.18) and women undergoing medically indicated labor induction had a 17.7% cesarean delivery rate (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.13, 2.54). Other variables that remained significant risk factors for cesarean delivery in the model included: epidural placement at less than 4 cm dilatation (OR 4.66; 95% CI 2.25, 9.66), epidural placement after 4 cm dilatation (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.06, 4.48), chorioamnionitis (OR 4.61; 95% CI 2.89, 7.35), birth weight greater than 4000 g (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.69, 3.97), maternal body mass index greater than 26 kg/m2 (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.61, 3.47), Asian race (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.04, 5.34), and magnesium sulfate use (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.04, 4.55).

CONCLUSION

Elective induction of labor is associated with a significantly increased risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women. Avoiding labor induction in settings of unproved benefit may aid efforts to reduce the primary cesarean delivery rate.

摘要

目的

量化足月初产妇择期引产与剖宫产的风险。

方法

我们在主要服务于私立产科诊所的一家大型城市产科机构进行了一项队列研究。在8个月期间分娩的所有足月、初产、单胎头位妊娠妇女(n = 1561)被分为三组:自然分娩、择期引产和医学指征引产。使用逐步逻辑回归来控制潜在混杂因素,以确定引产组剖宫产的风险。

结果

自然分娩的妇女剖宫产率为7.8%,而择期引产的妇女剖宫产率为17.5%(调整优势比[OR] 1.89;95%置信区间[CI] 1.12,3.18),医学指征引产的妇女剖宫产率为17.7%(OR 1.69;95% CI 1.13,2.54)。模型中仍为剖宫产显著危险因素的其他变量包括:宫口扩张小于4 cm时放置硬膜外导管(OR 4.66;95% CI 2.25,9.66)、宫口扩张4 cm后放置硬膜外导管(OR 2.18;95% CI 1.06,4.48)、绒毛膜羊膜炎(OR 4.61;95% CI 2.89,7.35)、出生体重超过4000 g(OR 2.59;95% CI

相似文献

1
Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women.初产妇足月选择性引产的剖宫产风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;94(4):600-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00377-4.
2
Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.初产妇引产术后的 Bishop 评分与剖宫产风险
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):690-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38.
3
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
4
Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.推荐的产程管理改变对预防初次剖宫产的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):341.e1-341.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.228. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
5
Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.≥39 孕周肥胖孕妇选择性引产与期待管理的结局比较。
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jun;37(7):695-707. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688471. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
6
Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.肥胖女性及其后代的择期引产与妊娠结局
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):12-22. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002408.
7
Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.足月初产妇剖宫产预测:前瞻性多中心 Genesis 研究结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):598.e1-598.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
8
Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term.足月初产妇引产与剖宫产的风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;116(1):35-42. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e10c5c.
9
Is the management of epidural analgesia associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery?硬膜外镇痛的管理是否与剖宫产风险增加相关?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;182(5):1058-62. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.105439.
10
Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.选择性在 39 周时引产与期待管理相比:队列研究的荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):304-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.046. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Labor Patterns: A Prospective Cohort Study in Greece.分娩模式的超声评估:希腊的一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 25;14(15):5283. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155283.
2
The CASPAR study protocol. Can cervical stiffness predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labour? a feasibility, cohort study.CASPAR研究方案。宫颈硬度能否预测引产术后阴道分娩成功?一项可行性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 16;20(1):e0311324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311324. eCollection 2025.
3
Stimulation Therapy to Induce Mothers: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
诱导母亲的刺激疗法:一项多中心随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 29;13:e63463. doi: 10.2196/63463.
4
Outcomes in low-risk patients before and after an institutional policy offering 39-week elective induction of labor.机构实施 39 周选择性引产政策前后低危患者的结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024 Dec;37(1):2295223. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2295223. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
5
A predictive model for successfully inducing active labor among pregnant women: Combining cervical status assessment and clinical characteristics.一种预测孕妇成功引产的模型:结合宫颈状态评估和临床特征。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 May 3;18:100196. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100196. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Impact of labor analgesia on mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in Japan: A retrospective cohort study.日本分娩镇痛对分娩方式和新生儿结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 12;18(4):e0284368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284368. eCollection 2023.
7
Factors and outcomes associated with the induction of labor in referral hospitals of Amhara regional state, Ethiopia: a multicenter study.与埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区转诊医院引产相关的因素和结果:一项多中心研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 20;21(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03709-5.
8
Cost of Elective Labor Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women.选择性引产与初产妇期待管理的成本比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;136(1):19-25. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003930.
9
Prevalence and risk factors for caesarean delivery following labor induction at a tertiary hospital in North Tanzania: a retrospective cohort study (2000-2015).坦桑尼亚北部一家三级医院行引产孕妇行剖宫产的流行率和危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究(2000-2015 年)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02861-8.
10
Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management.引产与期待治疗的卫生资源利用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4):369.e1-369.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 10.