Gibbs Pickens Cassandra M, Kramer Michael R, Howards Penelope P, Badell Martina L, Caughey Aaron B, Hogue Carol J
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, and Laney Graduate School and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):12-22. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002408.
To evaluate whether elective induction of labor between 39 through 41 weeks of gestation, as compared with expectant management, is associated with reduced cesarean delivery and other adverse outcomes among obese women and their offspring.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2007-2011 California Linked Patient Discharge Data-Birth Cohort File of 165,975 singleton, cephalic, nonanomalous deliveries to obese women. For each gestational week (39-41), we used multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by parity, to assess whether elective induction of labor or expectant management was associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery and other adverse outcomes.
At 39 and 40 weeks of gestation, cesarean delivery was less common in obese nulliparous women who were electively induced compared with those who were expectantly managed (at 39 weeks of gestation, frequencies were 35.9% vs 41.0%, respectively [P<.05]; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88). Severe maternal morbidity was less frequent among electively induced obese nulliparous patients (at 39 weeks of gestation, 5.6% vs 7.6% [P<.05]; adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.87). Neonatal intensive care unit admission was less common among electively induced obese nulliparous women (at 39 weeks of gestation, 7.9% vs 10.1% [P<.05]; adjusted OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.89). Patterns were similar among obese parous women at 39 weeks of gestation (crude frequencies and adjusted ORs [95% CIs] were as follows: for cesarean delivery, 7.0% vs 8.7% [P<.05] and 0.79 [0.73-0.86]; for severe maternal morbidity, 3.3% vs 4.0% [P<.05] and 0.83 [0.74-0.94]; for neonatal intensive care unit admission: 5.3% vs 7.4% [P<.05] and 0.75 [0.68-0.82]). Similarly, elective induction at 40 weeks of gestation was associated with reduced odds of cesarean delivery, maternal morbidity, and neonatal intensive care unit admission among both obese nulliparous and parous patients.
Elective labor induction after 39 weeks of gestation was associated with reduced maternal and neonatal morbidity among obese women. Further prospective investigation is necessary.
评估与期待管理相比,孕39至41周选择性引产是否会降低肥胖女性及其后代剖宫产及其他不良结局的发生率。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用2007 - 2011年加利福尼亚州患者出院数据与出生队列文件,其中包含165,975例肥胖女性的单胎、头位、非畸形分娩。对于每个孕周(39 - 41周),我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型,并按产次分层,以评估选择性引产或期待管理是否与较低的剖宫产及其他不良结局发生率相关。
在孕39周和40周时,与接受期待管理的肥胖初产妇相比,选择性引产的肥胖初产妇剖宫产发生率较低(孕39周时,发生率分别为35.9%和41.0% [P <.05];调整后的优势比[OR]为0.82,95%可信区间[CI]为0.77 - 0.88)。选择性引产的肥胖初产妇严重母体并发症发生率较低(孕39周时,分别为5.6%和7.6% [P <.05];调整后的OR为0.75,95% CI为0.65 - 0.87)。选择性引产的肥胖初产妇新生儿重症监护病房入院率较低(孕39周时,分别为7.9%和10.1% [P <.05];调整后的OR为0.79,95% CI为0.70 - 0.89)。孕39周时肥胖经产妇的情况类似(粗发生率和调整后的OR[95% CI]如下:剖宫产,分别为7.0%和8.7% [P <.05],0.79 [0.73 - 0.86];严重母体并发症,分别为3.3%和4.0% [P <.05],0.83 [0.74 - 0.94];新生儿重症监护病房入院:分别为5.3%和7.4% [P <.05],0.75 [0.68 - 0.82])。同样,孕40周时选择性引产与肥胖初产妇和经产妇剖宫产、母体并发症及新生儿重症监护病房入院发生率降低相关。
孕39周后选择性引产与肥胖女性母体及新生儿并发症发生率降低相关。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究。