论男同性恋类型的有效性。

On the validity of typologies of gay males.

作者信息

Harry J

出版信息

J Homosex. 1976;2(2):143-52. doi: 10.1300/j082v02n02_05.

Abstract

The classical dichotomization of male homosexuals into passive and active or insertee and inserter types is tested against empirical evidence. Data on the sexual preferences of 243 male homosexuals are analyzed to determine the extent to which they fit the insertee-inserter dichotomy. The fit between the dichotomy and the data is found to be very poor. The most popular set of sexual preferences is for all roles combined, both active and passive anal and oral. It is suggested that the concepts of oral and anal may better characterize the sexual preferences of male homosexuals than those of insertee and inserter. A variety of complex interaction effects among sexual preferences are also reported.

摘要

针对男性同性恋者划分为被动型和主动型或被插入者和插入者类型这一经典二分法，进行了实证证据检验。分析了243名男性同性恋者的性偏好数据，以确定他们符合被插入者 - 插入者二分法的程度。发现二分法与数据之间的契合度非常低。最受欢迎的性偏好组合是所有角色的综合，包括主动和被动的肛门及口交行为。研究表明，与被插入者和插入者的概念相比，口交和肛交的概念可能更能描述男性同性恋者的性偏好。还报告了性偏好之间的各种复杂交互效应。