Kelly F W, Terry R, Naglieri R
Family Practice Residency Program, Wilson Memorial Regional Medical Center, Johnson City, NY 13790, USA.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1999 Sep;99(9):470-4. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.1999.99.9.470.
This article reviews a number of nonevidenced-based studies that have been conducted on the different physical positions of labor and delivery. A review of the literature disclosed that the traditional supine position appeared to be associated with a prolonged second stage of labor and persistence of occiput posterior presentations. However, the supine and left lateral positions are excellent for providing anesthesia and access, although there may be a little added benefit for the parturient's comfort. The sitting, squatting, and hands-and-knees positions offer superior patient participation. The squatting position held for a long time may be physically stressful. The sitting and standing positions are known for occasional excessive hemorrhage and added expense. The hands-and-knees position offers the advantages of the gravitation effect of the upright positions and may be associated with less perineal damage. Overall, there has been no report of any harm to the infant when alternative positions are used.
本文回顾了一些关于分娩时不同体位的非循证研究。文献综述表明,传统的仰卧位似乎与第二产程延长及枕后位持续存在有关。然而,仰卧位和左侧卧位在提供麻醉和操作便利性方面表现出色,尽管对产妇舒适度可能只有些许额外益处。坐位、蹲位和手膝位能让患者有更好的参与度。长时间保持蹲位可能对身体造成压力。坐位和站位偶尔会出现过多出血且费用增加。手膝位具有直立位的重力作用优势,且可能减少会阴损伤。总体而言,使用替代体位时未出现对婴儿有任何伤害的报告。