Le Ray Camille, Lepleux Flavie, De La Calle Aurélie, Guerin Jessy, Sellam Nathalie, Dreyfus Michel, Chantry Anne A
Port-Royal Maternity Unit, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France; Inserm UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Caen University Hospital, Caen Basse-Normandie University, Caen, France.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):511.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.033. Epub 2016 May 27.
Fetal occiput posterior positions are associated with poorer maternal outcomes than occiput anterior positions. Although methods that include instrumental and manual rotation can be used at the end of labor to promote the rotation of the fetal head, various maternal postures may also be performed from the beginning of labor in occiput posterior position. Such postures might facilitate flexion of the fetal head and favor its rotation into an occiput anterior position.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether a lateral asymmetric decubitus posture facilitates the rotation of fetal occiput posterior into occiput anterior positions.
Evaluation of Decubitus Lateral Asymmetric posture was a multicenter randomized controlled trial that included 322 women from May 2013 through December 2014. Study participants were women who labored with ruptured membranes and a term fetus that was confirmed by ultrasound imaging to be in cephalic posterior position. Women who were assigned to the intervention group were asked to lie in a lateral asymmetric decubitus posture on the side opposite that of the fetal spine during the first hour and encouraged to maintain this position for as long as possible during the first stage of labor. In the control group, women adopted a dorsal recumbent posture during the first hour after random assignment. The primary outcome was occiput anterior position at 1 hour after random assignment. Secondary outcomes were occiput anterior position at complete dilation, mode of delivery, speed of dilation during the active first stage, maternal pain, and women's satisfaction.
One hundred sixty women were assigned to the intervention group, and 162 women were assigned to the control group. One hour after random assignment, the rates of occiput anterior position did not differ between the intervention and control groups (21.9% vs 21.6%, respectively; P=.887). Occiput anterior rates did not differ between groups at complete dilation (43.7% vs 43.2%, respectively; P=.565) or at birth (83.1% vs 86.4%, respectively; P=.436). Finally, the groups did not differ significantly for cesarean delivery rates (18.1% among women in lateral asymmetric decubitus and 14.2% among control subjects (P=0.608) or for speed of cervical dilation during the active first stage of labor (P=.684), pain assessment (P=.705), or women's satisfaction (P=.326). No maternal or neonatal adverse effect that was associated with either posture was observed.
Lateral asymmetric decubitus position on the side opposite that of the fetal spine did not facilitate rotation of fetal head. Nevertheless, other maternal positions may be effective in promoting fetal head rotation. Further research is needed; posturing during labor, nonetheless, should remain a woman's active choice.
与枕前位相比,胎儿枕后位与产妇预后较差相关。尽管在分娩末期可采用器械旋转和手法旋转等方法来促进胎头旋转,但对于枕后位产妇,从分娩开始也可采用各种产妇体位。这些体位可能有助于胎头俯屈,并有利于其旋转至枕前位。
本研究旨在确定侧方不对称卧位是否有助于胎儿枕后位旋转至枕前位。
侧方不对称卧位评估是一项多中心随机对照试验,从2013年5月至2014年12月纳入了322名女性。研究参与者为胎膜已破且经超声成像确认足月胎儿为头位后位的产妇。被分配到干预组的女性被要求在第一小时侧卧于与胎儿脊柱相对的一侧,呈侧方不对称卧位,并在分娩第一产程中尽可能长时间保持该体位。在对照组中,女性在随机分组后的第一小时采用仰卧位。主要结局是随机分组后1小时的枕前位。次要结局包括宫口开全时的枕前位、分娩方式、活跃期第一产程的宫口扩张速度、产妇疼痛及产妇满意度。
160名女性被分配到干预组,162名女性被分配到对照组。随机分组后1小时,干预组和对照组的枕前位发生率无差异(分别为21.9%和21.6%;P = 0.887)。宫口开全时两组的枕前位发生率无差异(分别为43.7%和43.2%;P = 0.565),出生时也无差异(分别为83.1%和86.4%;P = 0.436)。最后,两组在剖宫产率(侧方不对称卧位组产妇为18.1%,对照组为14.2%(P = 0.608))、活跃期第一产程宫颈扩张速度(P = 0.684)、疼痛评估(P = 0.705)或产妇满意度(P = 0.326)方面无显著差异。未观察到与任何一种体位相关的产妇或新生儿不良反应。
侧卧于与胎儿脊柱相对的一侧的侧方不对称卧位并不能促进胎头旋转。然而,其他产妇体位可能对促进胎头旋转有效。仍需进一步研究;不过,分娩时的体位选择应始终是女性的主动选择。